GHSA-VGXX-7QQ2-4HRV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-11-12 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Bluetooth: L2CAP: fix out-of-bounds write in l2cap_ecred_connect

l2cap_chan_connect() tries to ensure there are no more than L2CAP_ECRED_CONN_SCID_MAX pending ECRED channels, so they fit in the same L2CAP_ECRED_CONN_REQ that l2cap_ecred_connect() constructs.

However, the check only counts deferred channels. If 6 L2CAP sockets are connected at the same time in order DDDDND (D=deferred, N=non-deferred), the last can bump the total to max+1. It results to one __le16 written out of bounds of the scid array, and an invalid ECRED_CONN_REQ being sent.

Fix by leaving room for the non-deferred pending ECRED channels in the counting in l2cap_chan_connect(), so the limit can't be exceeded.

Move counting under same critical section where the channel is added. Although race conditions involving this appear unreachable, it's easier to see.

Also add WARN_ON_ONCE check in l2cap_ecred_defer_connect() to make this less brittle.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-98107"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-25T11:17:41Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: L2CAP: fix out-of-bounds write in l2cap_ecred_connect\n\nl2cap_chan_connect() tries to ensure there are no more than\nL2CAP_ECRED_CONN_SCID_MAX pending ECRED channels, so they fit in the\nsame L2CAP_ECRED_CONN_REQ that l2cap_ecred_connect() constructs.\n\nHowever, the check only counts deferred channels.  If 6 L2CAP sockets\nare connected at the same time in order DDDDND (D=deferred,\nN=non-deferred), the last can bump the total to max+1.  It results to\none __le16 written out of bounds of the scid array, and an invalid\nECRED_CONN_REQ being sent.\n\nFix by leaving room for the non-deferred pending ECRED channels in the\ncounting in l2cap_chan_connect(), so the limit can\u0027t be exceeded.\n\nMove counting under same critical section where the channel is added.\nAlthough race conditions involving this appear unreachable, it\u0027s easier\nto see.\n\nAlso add WARN_ON_ONCE check in l2cap_ecred_defer_connect() to make this\nless brittle.",
  "id": "GHSA-vgxx-7qq2-4hrv",
  "modified": "2026-11-12T18:31:13Z",
  "published": "2026-09-25T12:31:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98107"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/56c2b5831d39dc84aad2573dc3e197af1a872a05"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6da5c0331fc3ef0c7b8df8269523fc3b2cce1e65"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce0927eb3ee2939fab5ce3f9334bfd2fafb38481"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/df8c3af6132640da4788e96a02d653e642059803"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fabc5e04f123225daf980d03f2c5a05e7f0f0a7f"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.