GHSA-VC52-MWGJ-FH66
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 00:00 – Updated: 2022-05-02 00:00
VLAI?
Details
SQL injection vulnerability in Comsenz EPShop (aka ECShop) before 3.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the pid parameter in a (1) pro_show or (2) disppro action to the default URI.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-3412"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-89"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-07-31T17:41:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "SQL injection vulnerability in Comsenz EPShop (aka ECShop) before 3.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the pid parameter in a (1) pro_show or (2) disppro action to the default URI.",
"id": "GHSA-vc52-mwgj-fh66",
"modified": "2022-05-02T00:00:00Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T00:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3412"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/44025"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/6139"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4090"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30387"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…