GHSA-V7W4-33P2-QJCR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 15:31 – Updated: 2026-05-15 15:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: do not ASSERT() when the fs flips RO inside btrfs_repair_io_failure()

[BUG] There is a bug report that when btrfs hits ENOSPC error in a critical path, btrfs flips RO (this part is expected, although the ENOSPC bug still needs to be addressed).

The problem is after the RO flip, if there is a read repair pending, we can hit the ASSERT() inside btrfs_repair_io_failure() like the following:

BTRFS info (device vdc): relocating block group 30408704 flags metadata|raid1 ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28) WARNING: fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3235 at __btrfs_free_extent.isra.0+0x453/0xfd0, CPU#1: btrfs/383844 Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass [...] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- BTRFS info (device vdc state EA): 2 enospc errors during balance BTRFS info (device vdc state EA): balance: ended with status: -30 BTRFS error (device vdc state EA): parent transid verify failed on logical 30556160 mirror 2 wanted 8 found 6 BTRFS error (device vdc state EA): bdev /dev/nvme0n1 errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 10, gen 0 [...] assertion failed: !(fs_info->sb->s_flags & SB_RDONLY) :: 0, in fs/btrfs/bio.c:938 ------------[ cut here ]------------ assertion failed: !(fs_info->sb->s_flags & SB_RDONLY) :: 0, in fs/btrfs/bio.c:938 kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/bio.c:938! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 868 Comm: kworker/u8:13 Tainted: G W N 6.19.0-rc6+ #4788 PREEMPT(full) Tainted: [W]=WARN, [N]=TEST Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.17.0-0-gb52ca86e094d-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: btrfs-endio simple_end_io_work RIP: 0010:btrfs_repair_io_failure.cold+0xb2/0x120 RSP: 0000:ffffc90001d2bcf0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000051 RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8305cf42 RDI: 00000000ffffffff RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 00000000fffeffff R09: ffffffff837fa988 R10: ffffffff8327a9e0 R11: 6f69747265737361 R12: ffff88813018d310 R13: ffff888168b8a000 R14: ffffc90001d2bd90 R15: ffff88810a169000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8885e752c000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 ------------[ cut here ]------------

[CAUSE] The cause of -ENOSPC error during the test case btrfs/124 is still unknown, although it's known that we still have cases where metadata can be over-committed but can not be fulfilled correctly, thus if we hit such ENOSPC error inside a critical path, we have no choice but abort the current transaction.

This will mark the fs read-only.

The problem is inside the btrfs_repair_io_failure() path that we require the fs not to be mount read-only. This is normally fine, but if we are doing a read-repair meanwhile the fs flips RO due to a critical error, we can enter btrfs_repair_io_failure() with super block set to read-only, thus triggering the above crash.

[FIX] Just replace the ASSERT() with a proper return if the fs is already read-only.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-43299"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-08T14:16:37Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: do not ASSERT() when the fs flips RO inside btrfs_repair_io_failure()\n\n[BUG]\nThere is a bug report that when btrfs hits ENOSPC error in a critical\npath, btrfs flips RO (this part is expected, although the ENOSPC bug\nstill needs to be addressed).\n\nThe problem is after the RO flip, if there is a read repair pending, we\ncan hit the ASSERT() inside btrfs_repair_io_failure() like the following:\n\n  BTRFS info (device vdc): relocating block group 30408704 flags metadata|raid1\n  ------------[ cut here ]------------\n  BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)\n  WARNING: fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3235 at __btrfs_free_extent.isra.0+0x453/0xfd0, CPU#1: btrfs/383844\n  Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass\n  [...]\n  ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\n  BTRFS info (device vdc state EA): 2 enospc errors during balance\n  BTRFS info (device vdc state EA): balance: ended with status: -30\n  BTRFS error (device vdc state EA): parent transid verify failed on logical 30556160 mirror 2 wanted 8 found 6\n  BTRFS error (device vdc state EA): bdev /dev/nvme0n1 errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 10, gen 0\n  [...]\n  assertion failed: !(fs_info-\u003esb-\u003es_flags \u0026 SB_RDONLY) :: 0, in fs/btrfs/bio.c:938\n  ------------[ cut here ]------------\n  assertion failed: !(fs_info-\u003esb-\u003es_flags \u0026 SB_RDONLY) :: 0, in fs/btrfs/bio.c:938\n  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/bio.c:938!\n  Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI\n  CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 868 Comm: kworker/u8:13 Tainted: G        W        N  6.19.0-rc6+ #4788 PREEMPT(full)\n  Tainted: [W]=WARN, [N]=TEST\n  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.17.0-0-gb52ca86e094d-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\n  Workqueue: btrfs-endio simple_end_io_work\n  RIP: 0010:btrfs_repair_io_failure.cold+0xb2/0x120\n  RSP: 0000:ffffc90001d2bcf0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n  RAX: 0000000000000051 RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: 0000000000000000\n  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8305cf42 RDI: 00000000ffffffff\n  RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 00000000fffeffff R09: ffffffff837fa988\n  R10: ffffffff8327a9e0 R11: 6f69747265737361 R12: ffff88813018d310\n  R13: ffff888168b8a000 R14: ffffc90001d2bd90 R15: ffff88810a169000\n  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8885e752c000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n  ------------[ cut here ]------------\n\n[CAUSE]\nThe cause of -ENOSPC error during the test case btrfs/124 is still\nunknown, although it\u0027s known that we still have cases where metadata can\nbe over-committed but can not be fulfilled correctly, thus if we hit\nsuch ENOSPC error inside a critical path, we have no choice but abort\nthe current transaction.\n\nThis will mark the fs read-only.\n\nThe problem is inside the btrfs_repair_io_failure() path that we require\nthe fs not to be mount read-only. This is normally fine, but if we are\ndoing a read-repair meanwhile the fs flips RO due to a critical error,\nwe can enter btrfs_repair_io_failure() with super block set to\nread-only, thus triggering the above crash.\n\n[FIX]\nJust replace the ASSERT() with a proper return if the fs is already\nread-only.",
  "id": "GHSA-v7w4-33p2-qjcr",
  "modified": "2026-05-15T15:30:33Z",
  "published": "2026-05-08T15:31:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43299"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ceaad6cd6e7fa5f73b0b2796a2e85d75d37e9f3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6df18c001e3dcebc08482d0adeacd0cfea08593"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…