GHSA-V5HF-7896-CMM7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-08-12 15:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm: page_ext: add count limit to page_ext_iter_next to prevent invalid PFN access

The page_ext iteration API does not validate if the PFN still belongs to a valid section while advancing the iterator. When dynamically adding memory in the hotplug path, it can lead to a NULL pointer dereference during page_ext_lookup at the boundary of the last valid section when iterator count equals __pgcount.

The for_each_page_ext() macro calls page_ext_iter_next() as its loop increment. for_each_page_ext() does a "__page_ext = page_ext_iter_next(&__iter)" at the end. This causes page_ext_iter_next() to increment iter->index past __pgcount and call page_ext_lookup(start_pfn + __pgcount). During memory hotplug (online), the PFN at start_pfn + __pgcount may belong to a section that has not yet been initialized, causing page_ext_lookup() to trigger a NULL pointer dereference.

[ 14.555124][ T846] Call trace: [ 14.555125][ T846] lookup_page_ext+0x6c/0x108 (P) [ 14.555127][ T846] page_ext_lookup+0x30/0x3c [ 14.555129][ T846] __reset_page_owner+0x11c/0x260 [ 14.571201][ T846] __free_pages_ok+0x5e8/0x8e0 [ 14.571204][ T846] __free_pages_core+0x78/0xf0 [ 14.571206][ T846] generic_online_page+0x14/0x24 [ 14.597782][ T846] online_pages+0x178/0x30c [ 14.597784][ T846] memory_block_change_state+0x284/0x32c [ 14.597787][ T846] memory_subsys_online+0x4c/0x64 [ 14.597789][ T846] device_online+0x88/0xb0 [ 14.597791][ T846] online_memory_block+0x30/0x40 [ 14.597793][ T846] walk_memory_blocks+0xac/0xe8 [ 14.597794][ T846] add_memory_resource+0x280/0x298 [ 14.656161][ T846] add_memory+0x60/0x98

Move the iteration boundary enforcement inside the iterator functions, so callers cannot inadvertently access beyond the requested range.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64295"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-476"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-25T10:17:10Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: page_ext: add count limit to page_ext_iter_next to prevent invalid PFN access\n\nThe page_ext iteration API does not validate if the PFN still belongs to a\nvalid section while advancing the iterator.  When dynamically adding\nmemory in the hotplug path, it can lead to a NULL pointer dereference\nduring page_ext_lookup at the boundary of the last valid section when\niterator count equals __pgcount.\n\nThe for_each_page_ext() macro calls page_ext_iter_next() as its loop\nincrement.  for_each_page_ext() does a \"__page_ext =\npage_ext_iter_next(\u0026__iter)\" at the end.  This causes page_ext_iter_next()\nto increment iter-\u003eindex past __pgcount and call page_ext_lookup(start_pfn\n+ __pgcount).  During memory hotplug (online), the PFN at start_pfn +\n__pgcount may belong to a section that has not yet been initialized,\ncausing page_ext_lookup() to trigger a NULL pointer dereference.\n\n[   14.555124][  T846] Call trace:\n[   14.555125][  T846]  lookup_page_ext+0x6c/0x108 (P)\n[   14.555127][  T846]  page_ext_lookup+0x30/0x3c\n[   14.555129][  T846]  __reset_page_owner+0x11c/0x260\n[   14.571201][  T846]  __free_pages_ok+0x5e8/0x8e0\n[   14.571204][  T846]  __free_pages_core+0x78/0xf0\n[   14.571206][  T846]  generic_online_page+0x14/0x24\n[   14.597782][  T846]  online_pages+0x178/0x30c\n[   14.597784][  T846]  memory_block_change_state+0x284/0x32c\n[   14.597787][  T846]  memory_subsys_online+0x4c/0x64\n[   14.597789][  T846]  device_online+0x88/0xb0\n[   14.597791][  T846]  online_memory_block+0x30/0x40\n[   14.597793][  T846]  walk_memory_blocks+0xac/0xe8\n[   14.597794][  T846]  add_memory_resource+0x280/0x298\n[   14.656161][  T846]  add_memory+0x60/0x98\n\nMove the iteration boundary enforcement inside the iterator functions, so\ncallers cannot inadvertently access beyond the requested range.",
  "id": "GHSA-v5hf-7896-cmm7",
  "modified": "2026-08-12T15:30:28Z",
  "published": "2026-07-25T12:31:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64295"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/377b1cd6bbcf327338cd951cc2fd74bc75540235"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8dcaa0f87a88d720d13106f3a306c6b61d189d86"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ffd017237cfe99e6e5602ab14179b0e6878a0840"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.