GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-V4MR-5HV5-P6WP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

can: bcm: add missing rcu list annotations and operations

sashiko-bot remarked the missing use of list_add_rcu() in bcm_[rx|tx]_setup() to have a proper initialized bcm_op structure when bcm_proc_show() traverses the bcm_op's under rcu_read_lock().

To cover all initial settings of the bcm_op's the list_add_rcu() calls are moved to the end of the setup code.

While at it, also fix the mirroring removal side: bcm_release() called bcm_remove_op() - which frees the op via call_rcu() - on ops that were still linked in bo->tx_ops/bo->rx_ops, without list_del_rcu() first. Unlink each op with list_del_rcu() before handing it to bcm_remove_op(), matching the existing pattern in bcm_delete_tx_op()/bcm_delete_rx_op().

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72120"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:21:26Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncan: bcm: add missing rcu list annotations and operations\n\nsashiko-bot remarked the missing use of list_add_rcu() in\nbcm_[rx|tx]_setup() to have a proper initialized bcm_op structure\nwhen bcm_proc_show() traverses the bcm_op\u0027s under rcu_read_lock().\n\nTo cover all initial settings of the bcm_op\u0027s the list_add_rcu() calls\nare moved to the end of the setup code.\n\nWhile at it, also fix the mirroring removal side: bcm_release() called\nbcm_remove_op() - which frees the op via call_rcu() - on ops that were\nstill linked in bo-\u003etx_ops/bo-\u003erx_ops, without list_del_rcu() first.\nUnlink each op with list_del_rcu() before handing it to bcm_remove_op(),\nmatching the existing pattern in bcm_delete_tx_op()/bcm_delete_rx_op().",
  "id": "GHSA-v4mr-5hv5-p6wp",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:10Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72120"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/30f7bb922cb7e7f072a56c7cb7a5efccd2ceca1d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e22e8b505f877573bbdfdbcb680babad9b2f7a1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b2c3eabc4dafc062a25e10711154f2107526a78"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8357255e56dc1aaa437e3c53ee9385de984e0d57"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8e1c7257c81577130f5ce90f69b2a2c3ce63f957"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b06a4a397ac826603f39875cb7c7819a41365196"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb1c26eab4d1f0b4450439b4b88c3e73faf1da98"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f53bdab85e64eb57d6899a30d1307fd5a3639cc7"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…