GHSA-V3H4-P4RJ-F7H6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:11 – Updated: 2025-04-03 04:16
VLAI?
Details

WRQ Reflection for Secure IT Windows Server 6.0 (formerly known as F-Secure SSH server) does not properly handle when the Windows Administrator or Guest accounts are renamed after SSH key authentication has been configured, which allows remote attackers to use the original names during login.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-2770"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-09-02T23:03:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "WRQ Reflection for Secure IT Windows Server 6.0 (formerly known as F-Secure SSH server) does not properly handle when the Windows Administrator or Guest accounts are renamed after SSH key authentication has been configured, which allows remote attackers to use the original names during login.",
  "id": "GHSA-v3h4-p4rj-f7h6",
  "modified": "2025-04-03T04:16:59Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T02:11:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2770"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16649"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1014835"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://support.wrq.com/techdocs/1910.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/902110"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…