GHSA-V2MM-G69C-C43H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:43 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:43
VLAI?
Details
Polipo 1.0.4, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a request with a Cache-Control header that lacks a value for the max-age field, which triggers a segmentation fault in the httpParseHeaders function in http_parse.c, and possibly other unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-3305"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-12-24T16:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Polipo 1.0.4, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a request with a Cache-Control header that lacks a value for the max-age field, which triggers a segmentation fault in the httpParseHeaders function in http_parse.c, and possibly other unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-v2mm-g69c-c43h",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:43:50Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:43:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3305"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547047"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.bugs.dist/browse_thread/thread/dca6877a8117f0df"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37607"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/38647"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2002"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37463"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…