GHSA-RXPR-5MCQ-F379

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 00:03 – Updated: 2022-05-02 00:03
VLAI?
Details

Web Based Administration in MicroWorld Technologies MailScan 5.6.a espatch 1 stores sensitive information under the web root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to determine the installation path, IP addresses, and error messages via direct requests to files under LOG/.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-3728"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2008-08-20T16:41:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Web Based Administration in MicroWorld Technologies MailScan 5.6.a espatch 1 stores sensitive information under the web root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to determine the installation path, IP addresses, and error messages via direct requests to files under LOG/.",
  "id": "GHSA-rxpr-5mcq-f379",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T00:03:01Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T00:03:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3728"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/44518"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=121881329424635\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/31534"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4172"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.oliverkarow.de/research/mailscan.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30700"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…