GHSA-RX67-45QH-RQ2F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:04 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:04
VLAI
Details
Directory traversal vulnerability in CrossFTP Pro 1.65a, and probably earlier, allows remote FTP servers to write arbitrary files via a "..\" (dot dot backslash) in a filename.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-4153"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-22"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-11-03T20:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Directory traversal vulnerability in CrossFTP Pro 1.65a, and probably earlier, allows remote FTP servers to write arbitrary files via a \"..\\\" (dot dot backslash) in a filename.",
"id": "GHSA-rx67-45qh-rq2f",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:04:48Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:04:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-4153"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/62549"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/41852"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.htbridge.ch/advisory/directory_traversal_vulnerability_in_crossftp_pro.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/68700"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44070"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…