Vulnerability-Lookup

GHSA-RX3C-36RQ-FGF8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-21 12:31 – Updated: 2026-05-21 18:33

Details

In the case of the cap_net service, when a key present in the old limit was omitted from the new limit, the missing key was treated as "allow any" instead of being rejected.

In certain scenarios, an application that had previously restricted a subset of network operations could ask for a new limit that extended the permissions of the process.

Severity

6.5 (Medium)


                  
                    CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-45254"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-269"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-21T10:16:26Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the case of the cap_net service, when a key present in the old limit was omitted from the new limit, the missing key was treated as \"allow any\" instead of being rejected.\n\nIn certain scenarios, an application that had previously restricted a subset of network operations could ask for a new limit that extended the permissions of the process.",
  "id": "GHSA-rx3c-36rq-fgf8",
  "modified": "2026-05-21T18:33:08Z",
  "published": "2026-05-21T12:31:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45254"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:24.cap_net.asc"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

CVE-2026-45254 (GCVE-0-2026-45254)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-21 09:34 – Updated: 2026-05-21 14:37

Title

Incorrect libcap_net limitation list manipulation

Summary

In the case of the cap_net service, when a key present in the old limit was omitted from the new limit, the missing key was treated as "allow any" instead of being rejected. In certain scenarios, an application that had previously restricted a subset of network operations could ask for a new limit that extended the permissions of the process.

Severity

6.5 (Medium)


                        
                          CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

SSVC

Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial

CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)

Decision recorded 2026-05-21 14:35 UTC

CWE

CWE-269 - Improper Privilege Management

Assigner

freebsd CNA under the mitre root

CNA scorecard D 60/100 over 67 records in the last 180 days details

References

1 reference

URL	Tags
https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-S…	vendor-advisory

Impacted products

1 product

Vendor	Product	Version
FreeBSD	FreeBSD	Affected: 15.0-RELEASE , < p9 (release) Affected: 14.4-RELEASE , < p5 (release) Affected: 14.3-RELEASE , < p14 (release)

Date Public

2026-05-20 23:00

Credits

Joshua Rogers of AISLE Research Team

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 6.5,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
              "integrityImpact": "LOW",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-45254",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-05-21T14:35:55.800907Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-21T14:37:03.795Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "modules": [
            "libcap_net"
          ],
          "product": "FreeBSD",
          "vendor": "FreeBSD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "p9",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "15.0-RELEASE",
              "versionType": "release"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "p5",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "14.4-RELEASE",
              "versionType": "release"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "p14",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "14.3-RELEASE",
              "versionType": "release"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Joshua Rogers of AISLE Research Team"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-05-20T23:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "In the case of the cap_net service, when a key present in the old limit was omitted from the new limit, the missing key was treated as \"allow any\" instead of being rejected.\n\nIn certain scenarios, an application that had previously restricted a subset of network operations could ask for a new limit that extended the permissions of the process."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-269",
              "description": "CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-21T09:34:37.541Z",
        "orgId": "63664ac6-956c-4cba-a5d0-f46076e16109",
        "shortName": "freebsd"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:24.cap_net.asc"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Incorrect libcap_net limitation list manipulation",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "63664ac6-956c-4cba-a5d0-f46076e16109",
    "assignerShortName": "freebsd",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-45254",
    "datePublished": "2026-05-21T09:34:37.541Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-11T16:27:44.891Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-21T14:37:03.795Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

Order JSON

Publication & reservation Sightings KEV catalogs Other timestamps

Loading timeline…

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted