GHSA-RWMC-XPJ5-264G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:04 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:04
VLAI?
Details

A vulnerability exists in Schneider Electric's Pelco Sarix Professional in all firmware versions prior to 3.29.67 which could allow a remote attacker to delete arbitrary system file due to lack of validation of the /login/bin/set_param to the file name with the value of 'system.delete.sd_file'

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-7237"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-03-09T23:29:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability exists in Schneider Electric\u0027s Pelco Sarix Professional in all firmware versions prior to 3.29.67 which could allow a remote attacker to delete arbitrary system file due to lack of validation of the /login/bin/set_param to the file name with the value of \u0027system.delete.sd_file\u0027",
  "id": "GHSA-rwmc-xpj5-264g",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:04:07Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:04:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-7237"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.schneider-electric.com/en/download/document/SEVD-2018-058-01"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…