GHSA-RVG6-XG72-XC4W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:14 – Updated: 2025-04-09 04:03
VLAI?
Details
Niels Provos Systrace 1.6f and earlier on the x86_64 Linux platform allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions by making a 32-bit syscall with a syscall number that corresponds to a policy-compliant 64-bit syscall, related to race conditions that occur in monitoring 64-bit processes.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-0343"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-01-29T19:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Niels Provos Systrace 1.6f and earlier on the x86_64 Linux platform allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions by making a 32-bit syscall with a syscall number that corresponds to a policy-compliant 64-bit syscall, related to race conditions that occur in monitoring 64-bit processes.",
"id": "GHSA-rvg6-xg72-xc4w",
"modified": "2025-04-09T04:03:41Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:14:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0343"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2009-001.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2009/01/bypassing-syscall-filtering.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/systrace"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/500377/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33417"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…