CVE-2009-0343 (GCVE-0-2009-0343)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2009-01-29 19:00 – Updated: 2024-08-07 04:31
VLAI?
Summary
Niels Provos Systrace 1.6f and earlier on the x86_64 Linux platform allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions by making a 32-bit syscall with a syscall number that corresponds to a policy-compliant 64-bit syscall, related to race conditions that occur in monitoring 64-bit processes.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Date Public ?
2009-01-23 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T04:31:25.803Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/systrace/"
},
{
"name": "20090123 Problems with syscall filtering technologies on Linux",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/500377/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2009-001.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2009/01/bypassing-syscall-filtering.html"
},
{
"name": "33417",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33417"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2009-01-23T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Niels Provos Systrace 1.6f and earlier on the x86_64 Linux platform allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions by making a 32-bit syscall with a syscall number that corresponds to a policy-compliant 64-bit syscall, related to race conditions that occur in monitoring 64-bit processes."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-10-11T19:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/systrace/"
},
{
"name": "20090123 Problems with syscall filtering technologies on Linux",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/500377/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2009-001.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2009/01/bypassing-syscall-filtering.html"
},
{
"name": "33417",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33417"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2009-0343",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Niels Provos Systrace 1.6f and earlier on the x86_64 Linux platform allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions by making a 32-bit syscall with a syscall number that corresponds to a policy-compliant 64-bit syscall, related to race conditions that occur in monitoring 64-bit processes."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/systrace/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/systrace/"
},
{
"name": "20090123 Problems with syscall filtering technologies on Linux",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/500377/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2009-001.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2009-001.html"
},
{
"name": "http://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2009/01/bypassing-syscall-filtering.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2009/01/bypassing-syscall-filtering.html"
},
{
"name": "33417",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33417"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2009-0343",
"datePublished": "2009-01-29T19:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2009-01-29T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T04:31:25.803Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2009-0343",
"date": "2026-05-02",
"epss": "0.00098",
"percentile": "0.26837"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2009-0343\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2009-01-29T19:30:00.313\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-23T00:35:47.467\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Niels Provos Systrace 1.6f and earlier on the x86_64 Linux platform allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions by making a 32-bit syscall with a syscall number that corresponds to a policy-compliant 64-bit syscall, related to race conditions that occur in monitoring 64-bit processes.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Niels Provos Systrace v1.6f y anteriores en las plataformas Linux x86_64 permite a usuarios locales evitar las restricciones de acceso previstas, mediante una syscal de 32 bit, con un n\u00famero correspondiente a una llamada de 64 bit. Relacionada con las condiciones de carrera en la monitorizaci\u00f3n de procesos de 64 bit.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\",\"baseScore\":7.2,\"accessVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":10.0,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":true,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-264\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"operator\":\"AND\",\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:niels_provos:systrace:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"1.6e\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8C778AF1-B380-4456-8C6B-BDBFD7C31860\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:niels_provos:systrace:1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"38A786ED-B9C9-41EE-99E6-30BFA0DD984A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:niels_provos:systrace:1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"56D872DA-238E-4DA5-8187-4FEE1A63AC08\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:niels_provos:systrace:1.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"66D4199A-72A3-4EBE-919D-4366520E7848\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:niels_provos:systrace:1.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"DCE73152-5620-44A2-B09B-66CDBBAD1F41\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:niels_provos:systrace:1.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B210A03B-A13E-4F48-B5DA-D8D4EA3A2C69\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:niels_provos:systrace:1.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"DDF7BA51-FD3D-4FFF-B5AC-DB2CE6EDF5A1\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:niels_provos:systrace:1.6a:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F5300D33-C8AF-4389-8309-B375C36FC794\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:niels_provos:systrace:1.6b:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F316742F-6281-4749-AAA3-338B64042714\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:niels_provos:systrace:1.6c:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6DBB4B24-0570-47F4-ABF6-73C83BCD710F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:niels_provos:systrace:1.6d:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A484409A-8DD4-4CDE-A179-CAFDCB20AF3E\"}]},{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:_nil_:_nil_:x86_64:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"FA8AA941-3B59-458D-8C3F-EBB79B754F8C\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2009-001.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2009/01/bypassing-syscall-filtering.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/systrace/\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/500377/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33417\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2009-001.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2009/01/bypassing-syscall-filtering.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/systrace/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/500377/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33417\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…