GHSA-RR92-7PJ4-8WHF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-17 18:32 – Updated: 2026-10-15 12:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

dm-pcache: validate seg_id fields from persistent memory

cache_pos_decode(), cache_key_decode() and the last-kset branches of cache_replay(), the writeback worker and the GC worker take a cache segment id from the cache device metadata and index cache->segments[] with it without checking it against cache->n_segs. That metadata is only CRC-protected with a fixed public seed, so whoever supplies the cache device on a table load (CAP_SYS_ADMIN) controls the id; an out-of-range value forms a wild pcache_cache_segment pointer that is dereferenced and written through -- an out-of-bounds read and write driven by on-disk data.

Add cache_seg_id_valid() and reject an out-of-range id at each decode site, failing the operation with -EIO instead of indexing past the array. Bound the id against the initialized-segment count (cache_info.n_segs) rather than the physical device total. A forged cache_info.n_segs below seg_num otherwise leaves segments[cache_info.n_segs..seg_num) as zeroed structs whose data pointer is NULL, so a forged id in that window would still be dereferenced. A later patch guarantees cache_info.n_segs <= seg_num, and a driver-created cache sets the two equal, so valid images are unaffected.

Severity
7.8 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-93201"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-17T17:18:16Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndm-pcache: validate seg_id fields from persistent memory\n\ncache_pos_decode(), cache_key_decode() and the last-kset branches of\ncache_replay(), the writeback worker and the GC worker take a cache\nsegment id from the cache device metadata and index cache-\u003esegments[]\nwith it without checking it against cache-\u003en_segs. That metadata is only\nCRC-protected with a fixed public seed, so whoever supplies the cache\ndevice on a table load (CAP_SYS_ADMIN) controls the id; an out-of-range\nvalue forms a wild pcache_cache_segment pointer that is dereferenced and\nwritten through -- an out-of-bounds read and write driven by on-disk data.\n\nAdd cache_seg_id_valid() and reject an out-of-range id at each decode\nsite, failing the operation with -EIO instead of indexing past the array.\nBound the id against the initialized-segment count (cache_info.n_segs)\nrather than the physical device total. A forged cache_info.n_segs below\nseg_num otherwise leaves segments[cache_info.n_segs..seg_num) as zeroed\nstructs whose data pointer is NULL, so a forged id in that window would\nstill be dereferenced. A later patch guarantees cache_info.n_segs \u003c=\nseg_num, and a driver-created cache sets the two equal, so valid images\nare unaffected.",
  "id": "GHSA-rr92-7pj4-8whf",
  "modified": "2026-10-15T12:30:52Z",
  "published": "2026-09-17T18:32:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-93201"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90c990a68460d7b5720e5634cf650eccdf0f4098"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96d4b275281b45aacd0f0510fa8bec85d9f7dc5a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4bf8af5e7d7db4c5e179e15017da55857761ac4"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.