GHSA-RM44-GPWR-XH4Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-11-11 18:31 – Updated: 2026-11-11 18:31
VLAI
Details

Calling the wide scanf family of functions (swscanf, fwscanf, wscanf, vswscanf, vfwscanf and vwscanf) with a %s or %[ conversion without the 'l' length modifier in the GNU C Library version 2.2 to version 2.44 writes an extra null byte one past the end of the destination array when the converted multibyte string and its terminating null byte exactly fill that array.

These conversions store each wide input character into the caller's char array as a multibyte sequence. The conversion ends with the sequence that returns to the initial shift state, which also stores the terminating null byte, and the functions then append a second null byte. A destination sized for the converted string and one terminator, as the C standard requires the caller to provide, is therefore written one byte past its end. The out-of-bounds byte is always a null byte, which may corrupt adjacent data or crash the process. An attacker who supplies the input can trigger the overflow with a string whose converted length exactly fills the destination.

The narrow scanf functions, the %ls and %l[ conversions into a wchar_t array, and the 'a' and 'm' allocation modifiers are not affected, and storing a wide scanf conversion into a narrow char array is uncommon. This issue affects all architectures and ABIs supported by the GNU C Library.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-115819"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-193"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-11-11T16:17:24Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Calling the wide scanf family of functions (swscanf, fwscanf, wscanf, vswscanf, vfwscanf and vwscanf) with a %s or %[ conversion without the \u0027l\u0027 length modifier in the GNU C Library version 2.2 to version 2.44 writes an extra null byte one past the end of the destination array when the converted multibyte string and its terminating null byte exactly fill that array.\n\nThese conversions store each wide input character into the caller\u0027s char array as a multibyte sequence.  The conversion ends with the sequence that returns to the initial shift state, which also stores the terminating null byte, and the functions then append a second null byte.  A destination sized for the converted string and one terminator, as the C standard requires the caller to provide, is therefore written one byte past its end.  The out-of-bounds byte is always a null byte, which may corrupt adjacent data or crash the process.  An attacker who supplies the input can trigger the overflow with a string whose converted length exactly fills the destination.\n\nThe narrow scanf functions, the %ls and %l[ conversions into a wchar_t array, and the \u0027a\u0027 and \u0027m\u0027 allocation modifiers are not affected, and storing a wide scanf conversion into a narrow char array is uncommon.  This issue affects all architectures and ABIs supported by the GNU C Library.",
  "id": "GHSA-rm44-gpwr-xh4q",
  "modified": "2026-11-11T18:31:36Z",
  "published": "2026-11-11T18:31:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-115819"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34989"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob_plain;f=advisories/GLIBC-SA-2026-0027"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.