GHSA-RJWC-3V8M-48M3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-08 03:31 – Updated: 2025-12-08 03:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

md/raid0, raid10: Don't set discard sectors for request queue

It should use disk_stack_limits to get a proper max_discard_sectors rather than setting a value by stack drivers.

And there is a bug. If all member disks are rotational devices, raid0/raid10 set max_discard_sectors. So the member devices are not ssd/nvme, but raid0/raid10 export the wrong value. It reports warning messages in function __blkdev_issue_discard when mkfs.xfs like this:

[ 4616.022599] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 4616.027779] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 99634 at block/blk-lib.c:50 __blkdev_issue_discard+0x16a/0x1a0 [ 4616.140663] RIP: 0010:__blkdev_issue_discard+0x16a/0x1a0 [ 4616.146601] Code: 24 4c 89 20 31 c0 e9 fe fe ff ff c1 e8 09 8d 48 ff 4c 89 f0 4c 09 e8 48 85 c1 0f 84 55 ff ff ff b8 ea ff ff ff e9 df fe ff ff <0f> 0b 48 8d 74 24 08 e8 ea d6 00 00 48 c7 c6 20 1e 89 ab 48 c7 c7 [ 4616.167567] RSP: 0018:ffffaab88cbffca8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 4616.173406] RAX: ffff9ba1f9e44678 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff9ba1c9792080 [ 4616.181376] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9ba1c9792080 [ 4616.189345] RBP: 0000000000000cc0 R08: ffffaab88cbffd10 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 4616.197317] R10: 0000000000000012 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 4616.205288] R13: 0000000000400000 R14: 0000000000000cc0 R15: ffff9ba1c9792080 [ 4616.213259] FS: 00007f9a5534e980(0000) GS:ffff9ba1b7c80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 4616.222298] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 4616.228719] CR2: 000055a390a4c518 CR3: 0000000123e40006 CR4: 00000000001706e0 [ 4616.236689] Call Trace: [ 4616.239428] blkdev_issue_discard+0x52/0xb0 [ 4616.244108] blkdev_common_ioctl+0x43c/0xa00 [ 4616.248883] blkdev_ioctl+0x116/0x280 [ 4616.252977] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0 [ 4616.257163] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 [ 4616.261164] ? handle_mm_fault+0xc5/0x2a0 [ 4616.265652] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x1d8/0x690 [ 4616.270527] ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 [ 4616.274717] ? exc_page_fault+0x62/0x150 [ 4616.279097] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 4616.284748] RIP: 0033:0x7f9a55398c6b

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-50583"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-08T02:15:46Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd/raid0, raid10: Don\u0027t set discard sectors for request queue\n\nIt should use disk_stack_limits to get a proper max_discard_sectors\nrather than setting a value by stack drivers.\n\nAnd there is a bug. If all member disks are rotational devices,\nraid0/raid10 set max_discard_sectors. So the member devices are\nnot ssd/nvme, but raid0/raid10 export the wrong value. It reports\nwarning messages in function __blkdev_issue_discard when mkfs.xfs\nlike this:\n\n[ 4616.022599] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 4616.027779] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 99634 at block/blk-lib.c:50 __blkdev_issue_discard+0x16a/0x1a0\n[ 4616.140663] RIP: 0010:__blkdev_issue_discard+0x16a/0x1a0\n[ 4616.146601] Code: 24 4c 89 20 31 c0 e9 fe fe ff ff c1 e8 09 8d 48 ff 4c 89 f0 4c 09 e8 48 85 c1 0f 84 55 ff ff ff b8 ea ff ff ff e9 df fe ff ff \u003c0f\u003e 0b 48 8d 74 24 08 e8 ea d6 00 00 48 c7 c6 20 1e 89 ab 48 c7 c7\n[ 4616.167567] RSP: 0018:ffffaab88cbffca8 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[ 4616.173406] RAX: ffff9ba1f9e44678 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff9ba1c9792080\n[ 4616.181376] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9ba1c9792080\n[ 4616.189345] RBP: 0000000000000cc0 R08: ffffaab88cbffd10 R09: 0000000000000000\n[ 4616.197317] R10: 0000000000000012 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000\n[ 4616.205288] R13: 0000000000400000 R14: 0000000000000cc0 R15: ffff9ba1c9792080\n[ 4616.213259] FS:  00007f9a5534e980(0000) GS:ffff9ba1b7c80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 4616.222298] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 4616.228719] CR2: 000055a390a4c518 CR3: 0000000123e40006 CR4: 00000000001706e0\n[ 4616.236689] Call Trace:\n[ 4616.239428]  blkdev_issue_discard+0x52/0xb0\n[ 4616.244108]  blkdev_common_ioctl+0x43c/0xa00\n[ 4616.248883]  blkdev_ioctl+0x116/0x280\n[ 4616.252977]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0\n[ 4616.257163]  do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90\n[ 4616.261164]  ? handle_mm_fault+0xc5/0x2a0\n[ 4616.265652]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x1d8/0x690\n[ 4616.270527]  ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90\n[ 4616.274717]  ? exc_page_fault+0x62/0x150\n[ 4616.279097]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\n[ 4616.284748] RIP: 0033:0x7f9a55398c6b",
  "id": "GHSA-rjwc-3v8m-48m3",
  "modified": "2025-12-08T03:31:02Z",
  "published": "2025-12-08T03:31:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50583"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/27e5d61a8e6919b5c0c6f473703ffea2acba862a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8e1a2279ca2b0485cc379a153d02a9793f74a48f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e80bef070699d2e791badefccb1ddabd6998d468"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…