GHSA-RG84-FRXC-RFCX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-17 18:32 – Updated: 2026-10-30 15:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

arm64: ptrace: Keep 'orig_x0' in-sync with x0 on syscall entry

Commit e057b9477232 ("arm64: syscall: Ensure saved x0 is kept in-sync with tracer updates") attempted to resolve a long-standing issue with syscall entry tracing, where a tracer is able to manipulate the first syscall argument without being subjected to seccomp or audit checking.

Unfortunately, that fix was incomplete [1], as it failed to update 'orig_x0' between a tracer updating x0 during a seccomp ptrace exit (SECCOMP_RET_TRACE) and the seccomp filter being re-evaluated.

Rather than add hooks to the core seccomp code, instead move the synchronisation code into the ptrace GPR and syscall setting code so that 'orig_x0' is kept up to date with x0 whenever we're stopped on the syscall entry path.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-90347"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-17T17:17:33Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\narm64: ptrace: Keep \u0027orig_x0\u0027 in-sync with x0 on syscall entry\n\nCommit e057b9477232 (\"arm64: syscall: Ensure saved x0 is kept in-sync\nwith tracer updates\") attempted to resolve a long-standing issue with\nsyscall entry tracing, where a tracer is able to manipulate the first\nsyscall argument without being subjected to seccomp or audit checking.\n\nUnfortunately, that fix was incomplete [1], as it failed to update\n\u0027orig_x0\u0027 between a tracer updating x0 during a seccomp ptrace exit\n(SECCOMP_RET_TRACE) and the seccomp filter being re-evaluated.\n\nRather than add hooks to the core seccomp code, instead move the\nsynchronisation code into the ptrace GPR and syscall setting code so\nthat \u0027orig_x0\u0027 is kept up to date with x0 whenever we\u0027re stopped on the\nsyscall entry path.",
  "id": "GHSA-rg84-frxc-rfcx",
  "modified": "2026-10-30T15:33:37Z",
  "published": "2026-09-17T18:32:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-90347"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/332c9c1a148d0425326989c1187face8f6b2a60c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88b839ce497ccb1ff92f7ae742c78dd2937ba572"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a9e7743b1067ea38c4ad2665d40c3c4a920ad9a9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce17c651a90e242ad48df0df89b1e4cebcda5e14"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e9e2854fcff5733ffc607e8ecc87e0e591ab41fd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f433869f23841a50455c4087d85540d5b4d37cde"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.