GHSA-RCJJ-6J56-F2WH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-17 18:32 – Updated: 2026-09-18 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/erdma: complete object teardown when the destroy command fails

erdma_destroy_qp(), erdma_destroy_cq(), erdma_dereg_mr(), and erdma_destroy_ah() returned early when erdma_post_cmd_wait() failed, leaking the queue buffers, MTTs, doorbells and the STAG, QPN, CQN and AHN identifiers. A command timeout clears ERDMA_CMDQ_STATE_OK_BIT and permanently disables the command queue, so no retry can succeed; the RDMA core keeps the object after a failed destructor and forced uverbs cleanup then nulls the pointers, making the resources unreachable.

Warn on failure but release every software-owned resource and return success, since during terminal destruction the hardware command result is only diagnostic.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-92488"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-17T17:17:50Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/erdma: complete object teardown when the destroy command fails\n\nerdma_destroy_qp(), erdma_destroy_cq(), erdma_dereg_mr(), and\nerdma_destroy_ah() returned early when erdma_post_cmd_wait() failed,\nleaking the queue buffers, MTTs, doorbells and the STAG, QPN, CQN and AHN\nidentifiers. A command timeout clears ERDMA_CMDQ_STATE_OK_BIT and\npermanently disables the command queue, so no retry can succeed; the RDMA\ncore keeps the object after a failed destructor and forced uverbs cleanup\nthen nulls the pointers, making the resources unreachable.\n\nWarn on failure but release every software-owned resource and return\nsuccess, since during terminal destruction the hardware command result is\nonly diagnostic.",
  "id": "GHSA-rcjj-6j56-f2wh",
  "modified": "2026-09-18T18:31:32Z",
  "published": "2026-09-17T18:32:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-92488"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/334145d683ad3e31d052247f10807f2ebc950351"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5fcfc988ecf3e2bbe308b95c2c0d2f011d9afabe"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/652befcba956ef357f480525ccbe25c59bc81d4d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce7d205c264665517c25e8a3231cf2d0c2443e3c"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…