GHSA-RC4Q-9M69-GQP8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-05-17 20:53 – Updated: 2021-05-17 20:29Impact
Users that used fastify-csrf with the "double submit" mechanism using cookies with an application deployed across multiple subdomains, e.g. "heroku"-style platform as a service.
Patches
Version 3.1.0 of the fastify-csrf fixes it. See https://github.com/fastify/fastify-csrf/pull/51 and https://github.com/fastify/csrf/pull/2.
The user of the module would need to supply a userInfo when generating the CSRF token to fully implement the protection on their end. This is needed only for applications hosted on different subdomains.
Workarounds
None available.
References
- https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross-Site_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html
- https://owasp.org/www-pdf-archive/David_Johansson-Double_Defeat_of_Double-Submit_Cookie.pdf
Credits
This vulnerability was found by Xhelal Likaj xhelallikaj20@gmail.com.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in fastify-csrf * Email us at hello@matteocollina.com
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "fastify-csrf"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.1.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-29624"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352",
"CWE-565"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-17T20:29:48Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-05-19T22:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nUsers that used fastify-csrf with the \"double submit\" mechanism using cookies with an application deployed across multiple subdomains, e.g. \"heroku\"-style platform as a service. \n\n### Patches\n\nVersion 3.1.0 of the fastify-csrf fixes it. \nSee https://github.com/fastify/fastify-csrf/pull/51 and https://github.com/fastify/csrf/pull/2.\n\nThe user of the module would need to supply a `userInfo` when generating the CSRF token to fully implement the protection on their end. This is needed only for applications hosted on different subdomains.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nNone available.\n\n### References\n\n1. https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross-Site_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html\n2. https://owasp.org/www-pdf-archive/David_Johansson-Double_Defeat_of_Double-Submit_Cookie.pdf\n\n### Credits\n\nThis vulnerability was found by Xhelal Likaj \u003cxhelallikaj20@gmail.com\u003e.\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in [fastify-csrf](https://github.com/fastify/fastify-csrf)\n* Email us at [hello@matteocollina.com](mailto:hello@matteocollina.com)\n",
"id": "GHSA-rc4q-9m69-gqp8",
"modified": "2021-05-17T20:29:48Z",
"published": "2021-05-17T20:53:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-csrf/security/advisories/GHSA-rc4q-9m69-gqp8"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-29624"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/csrf/pull/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-csrf/pull/51"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross-Site_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-csrf/releases/tag/v3.1.0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://owasp.org/www-pdf-archive/David_Johansson-Double_Defeat_of_Double-Submit_Cookie.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Lack of protection against cookie tossing attacks in fastify-csrf"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.