GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-R9HR-VQWF-9Q7R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

batman-adv: tt: avoid request storms during pending request

batadv_send_tt_request() allocates a tt_req_node when none exists for the destination originator node. This should prevent that a multiple TT requests are send at the same time to an originator.

But if allocation of the send buffer failed, this request must be cleaned up again. But indicator for such a failure is "ret == false". But the actual implementation is checking for "ret == true".

The check must be inverted to not loose the information about the TT request directly after it was attempted to be sent out. This should avoid potential request storms.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72231"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:21:50Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbatman-adv: tt: avoid request storms during pending request\n\nbatadv_send_tt_request() allocates a tt_req_node when none exists for the\ndestination originator node. This should prevent that a multiple TT\nrequests are send at the same time to an originator.\n\nBut if allocation of the send buffer failed, this request must be cleaned\nup again. But indicator for such a failure is \"ret == false\". But the\nactual implementation is checking for \"ret == true\".\n\nThe check must be inverted to not loose the information about the TT\nrequest directly after it was attempted to be sent out. This should avoid\npotential request storms.",
  "id": "GHSA-r9hr-vqwf-9q7r",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:18Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72231"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/067e413eec2e63c2996909ef55214b3a0eda0be7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/21c44a6895f41df811d1c91d10eea194dda2b345"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/27c7d40008231ae4140d35501b60087a9de2d2c3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5e46c76d9a5062212c4c5f642a5549fd9c057f8a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6055695ea40c64a47e00742c12c99b1a33b4daed"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6a65ac8a81e903bb4b555c1d13532f5cb0167a4a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/716f434eb35869e130424331584a91fbb729b9bd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aba1cf21954e64c36afb966b754adad2b0b8aa48"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…