GHSA-R937-FW24-8FRW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:48 – Updated: 2022-05-24 16:48
VLAI
Details
app/backup/index.php in the Backup Module in FreePBX 4.4.3 suffers from a command injection vulnerability due to a lack of input validation, which allows authenticated administrative attackers to execute commands on the host.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-11410"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-06-17T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "app/backup/index.php in the Backup Module in FreePBX 4.4.3 suffers from a command injection vulnerability due to a lack of input validation, which allows authenticated administrative attackers to execute commands on the host.",
"id": "GHSA-r937-fw24-8frw",
"modified": "2022-05-24T16:48:10Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:48:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11410"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fusionpbx/fusionpbx/commit/0f965c89288de449236ad6de4f97960814ce8c84"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.gdssecurity.com/labs/2019/6/7/rce-using-caller-id-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-fusionpbx.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…