GHSA-R8GV-4RQ7-CHFP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:45 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:45
VLAI
Details

Buffer overflow in the LWZReadByte function in IMG_gif.c in SDL_image before 1.2.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted GIF file, a similar issue to CVE-2006-4484. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-6697"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2008-02-01T20:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in the LWZReadByte function in IMG_gif.c in SDL_image before 1.2.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted GIF file, a similar issue to CVE-2006-4484.  NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.",
  "id": "GHSA-r8gv-4rq7-chfp",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T18:45:31Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T18:45:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-6697"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/39865"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://issues.rpath.com/browse/RPL-2206"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00008.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00039.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207933"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=120110205511630\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/28640"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/28752"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/28830"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/28837"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/28850"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/28869"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/29542"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://vexillium.org/?sec-sdlgif"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://wiki.rpath.com/Advisories:rPSA-2008-0061"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1493"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200802-01.xml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.libsdl.org/cgi/viewvc.cgi/trunk/SDL_image/CHANGES?revision=3462\u0026view=markup"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.libsdl.org/cgi/viewvc.cgi/trunk/SDL_image/IMG_gif.c?r1=2970\u0026r2=3462"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2008:040"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/488079/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27417"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-595-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0266"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…