GHSA-R8GP-F9PJ-HX94
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:03 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:39
VLAI
Details
SQL injection vulnerability in content-audit-schedule.php in the Content Audit plugin before 1.6.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the "Audited content types" option in the content-audit page to wp-admin/options-general.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-5389"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-89"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-10-06T14:55:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "SQL injection vulnerability in content-audit-schedule.php in the Content Audit plugin before 1.6.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the \"Audited content types\" option in the content-audit page to wp-admin/options-general.php.",
"id": "GHSA-r8gp-f9pj-hx94",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:39:17Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:03:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-5389"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.dxw.com/advisories/blind-sqli-vulnerability-in-content-audit-could-allow-a-privileged-attacker-to-exfiltrate-password-hashes"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/content-audit/changelog"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/128525/WordPress-Content-Audit-1.6-Blind-SQL-Injection.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Oct/8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/70214"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…