GHSA-R6WH-WCH9-FXJR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-10-21 15:40
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: ath11k: cancel SSR work items during PCI shutdown

A reboot can crash the kernel if it overlaps with WLAN firmware crash recovery (SSR). The crash is a NULL pointer dereference in the MHI teardown path while freeing DMA-backed MHI contexts.

Simplified trace: dma_free_attrs mhi_deinit_dev_ctxt [mhi] ath11k_pci_power_down [ath11k_pci] ath11k_pci_shutdown [ath11k_pci] device_shutdown kernel_restart

On the host side, SSR is driven by the MHI RDDM callback, which queues reset_work to perform device recovery. reset_work power-cycles the device by calling ath11k_hif_power_down() followed by ath11k_hif_power_up(). The power-down phase deinitializes MHI and frees DMA resources.

Shutdown/reboot runs fully asynchronously with this RDDM-driven SSR recovery flow. As a result, the shutdown path (ath11k_pci_shutdown() -> ath11k_pci_power_down()) can race with the SSR recovery sequence.

Fix this by canceling SSR-related work items during PCI shutdown, marking the device as unregistering, and serializing the RDDM callback path that checks and queues reset_work. This ensures that no new SSR recovery work can be queued once teardown has started, and that any in-flight recovery work is fully synchronized before device power-down, preventing MHI teardown and DMA resource freeing from running more than once.

Note: This issue only affects PCI/MHI-based devices. AHB-based ath11k devices do not queue reset_work in normal SSR flows.

Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.1 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-04866.5-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_IOE-1

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-74407"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:42Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: ath11k: cancel SSR work items during PCI shutdown\n\nA reboot can crash the kernel if it overlaps with WLAN firmware crash\nrecovery (SSR). The crash is a NULL pointer dereference in the MHI teardown\npath while freeing DMA-backed MHI contexts.\n\nSimplified trace:\n  dma_free_attrs\n  mhi_deinit_dev_ctxt [mhi]\n  ath11k_pci_power_down [ath11k_pci]\n  ath11k_pci_shutdown [ath11k_pci]\n  device_shutdown\n  kernel_restart\n\nOn the host side, SSR is driven by the MHI RDDM callback, which queues\nreset_work to perform device recovery. reset_work power-cycles the device\nby calling ath11k_hif_power_down() followed by ath11k_hif_power_up(). The\npower-down phase deinitializes MHI and frees DMA resources.\n\nShutdown/reboot runs fully asynchronously with this RDDM-driven SSR\nrecovery flow. As a result, the shutdown path\n(ath11k_pci_shutdown() -\u003e ath11k_pci_power_down()) can race with the SSR\nrecovery sequence.\n\nFix this by canceling SSR-related work items during PCI shutdown, marking\nthe device as unregistering, and serializing the RDDM callback path that\nchecks and queues reset_work. This ensures that no new SSR recovery work\ncan be queued once teardown has started, and that any in-flight recovery\nwork is fully synchronized before device power-down, preventing MHI\nteardown and DMA resource freeing from running more than once.\n\nNote: This issue only affects PCI/MHI-based devices. AHB-based ath11k\ndevices do not queue reset_work in normal SSR flows.\n\nTested-on: WCN6855 hw2.1 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-04866.5-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_IOE-1",
  "id": "GHSA-r6wh-wch9-fxjr",
  "modified": "2026-10-21T15:40:58Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74407"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/53dd29e8aeb2a1b5f079178551836b85fc6b53df"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6dd3701facc0cee62d6682e49eed64499f9d0e43"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8c79aac429b583301f387374ff37c59be671df87"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/daeb44fb8d700654f37f54d1ee36cd67645d0d34"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f82d42577ee4a191b0ad0f0a3b49fc1935dff845"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.