GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-R48X-XHW6-JMG8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Reject negative const offsets for buffer pointers

The verifier rejects variable offsets for PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER and PTR_TO_BUF accesses, but it currently accepts a constant negative offset produced by pointer arithmetic.

Commit 022ac0750883 ("bpf: use reg->var_off instead of reg->off for pointers") moved constant pointer offsets from reg->off to reg->var_off. However, __check_buffer_access() continued to check only the instruction offset. An access with reg->var_off equal to -8 and an instruction offset of zero therefore passes verification.

For writable raw tracepoints, the access end is also calculated from the unsigned reg->var_off.value. An eight-byte access starting at -8 wraps the calculated end to zero, allowing the program to load and attach without increasing max_tp_access.

After ensuring that reg->var_off is constant, calculate the effective access start using signed arithmetic and reject it when it is negative. Use the validated start to calculate the access end for both PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER and PTR_TO_BUF.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-68462"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:18:39Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Reject negative const offsets for buffer pointers\n\nThe verifier rejects variable offsets for PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER and PTR_TO_BUF\naccesses, but it currently accepts a constant negative offset produced by\npointer arithmetic.\n\nCommit 022ac0750883 (\"bpf: use reg-\u003evar_off instead of reg-\u003eoff for\npointers\") moved constant pointer offsets from reg-\u003eoff to reg-\u003evar_off.\nHowever, __check_buffer_access() continued to check only the instruction\noffset. An access with reg-\u003evar_off equal to -8 and an instruction offset\nof zero therefore passes verification.\n\nFor writable raw tracepoints, the access end is also calculated from the\nunsigned reg-\u003evar_off.value. An eight-byte access starting at -8 wraps\nthe calculated end to zero, allowing the program to load and attach\nwithout increasing max_tp_access.\n\nAfter ensuring that reg-\u003evar_off is constant, calculate the effective\naccess start using signed arithmetic and reject it when it is negative.\nUse the validated start to calculate the access end for both\nPTR_TO_TP_BUFFER and PTR_TO_BUF.",
  "id": "GHSA-r48x-xhw6-jmg8",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:03Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-68462"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/314bd592085c0720ef519f6edbc5f41440ff78d4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd4cfa8c8f9a17cdec0539334d28754bc1d8a5d9"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…