GHSA-QXH5-H6MX-QV45

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-16 18:31 – Updated: 2025-12-16 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

can: kvaser_usb: leaf: Fix potential infinite loop in command parsers

The kvaser_usb_leaf_wait_cmd() and kvaser_usb_leaf_read_bulk_callback functions contain logic to zero-length commands. These commands are used to align data to the USB endpoint's wMaxPacketSize boundary.

The driver attempts to skip these placeholders by aligning the buffer position pos to the next packet boundary using round_up() function.

However, if zero-length command is found exactly on a packet boundary (i.e., pos is a multiple of wMaxPacketSize, including 0), round_up function will return the unchanged value of pos. This prevents pos to be increased, causing an infinite loop in the parsing logic.

This patch fixes this in the function by using pos + 1 instead. This ensures that even if pos is on a boundary, the calculation is based on pos + 1, forcing round_up() to always return the next aligned boundary.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-68308"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-16T16:16:10Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncan: kvaser_usb: leaf: Fix potential infinite loop in command parsers\n\nThe `kvaser_usb_leaf_wait_cmd()` and `kvaser_usb_leaf_read_bulk_callback`\nfunctions contain logic to zero-length commands. These commands are used\nto align data to the USB endpoint\u0027s wMaxPacketSize boundary.\n\nThe driver attempts to skip these placeholders by aligning the buffer\nposition `pos` to the next packet boundary using `round_up()` function.\n\nHowever, if zero-length command is found exactly on a packet boundary\n(i.e., `pos` is a multiple of wMaxPacketSize, including 0), `round_up`\nfunction will return the unchanged value of `pos`. This prevents `pos`\nto be increased, causing an infinite loop in the parsing logic.\n\nThis patch fixes this in the function by using `pos + 1` instead.\nThis ensures that even if `pos` is on a boundary, the calculation is\nbased on `pos + 1`, forcing `round_up()` to always return the next\naligned boundary.",
  "id": "GHSA-qxh5-h6mx-qv45",
  "modified": "2025-12-16T18:31:34Z",
  "published": "2025-12-16T18:31:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68308"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/028e89c7e8b4346302e88df01cc50e0a1f05791a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0897cea266e39166a36111059ba147192b36592f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0c73772cd2b8cc108d5f5334de89ad648d89b9ec"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/58343e0a4d43699f0e2f5b169384bbe4c0217add"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69c7825df64e24dc15d31631a1fc9145324b1345"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd8135a560cf6e64f0b98ed4daadf126a38f7f48"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e9dd83a75a7274edef21682c823bf0b66d7b6b7f"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.