GHSA-QWCM-8GH9-XC6H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-14 15:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

libceph: reject buckets with mismatched CRUSH ids

crush_decode() stores bucket data by array slot, and the mapper later derives the per-bucket workspace index from the decoded bucket id. A malformed map can therefore make one bucket reuse another bucket's workspace by encoding an id different from -1 - slot.

For uniform buckets, the second replica selection expands the source bucket's permutation into that aliased workspace buffer. If the source bucket is larger than the aliased bucket, the write runs past the smaller permutation array and can escape the kvmalloc'd CRUSH workspace. KASAN reports a slab OOB write of 4 bytes in bucket_perm_choose().

Reject buckets whose encoded id does not match their array slot. Valid CRUSH maps already use the canonical negative id corresponding to the bucket slot, so this restores the invariant expected by work->work[-1 - in->id] without changing valid map behavior.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89656"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:51Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nlibceph: reject buckets with mismatched CRUSH ids\n\ncrush_decode() stores bucket data by array slot, and the mapper later\nderives the per-bucket workspace index from the decoded bucket id. A\nmalformed map can therefore make one bucket reuse another bucket\u0027s\nworkspace by encoding an id different from -1 - slot.\n\nFor uniform buckets, the second replica selection expands the source\nbucket\u0027s permutation into that aliased workspace buffer. If the source\nbucket is larger than the aliased bucket, the write runs past the smaller\npermutation array and can escape the kvmalloc\u0027d CRUSH workspace. KASAN\nreports a slab OOB write of 4 bytes in bucket_perm_choose().\n\nReject buckets whose encoded id does not match their array slot. Valid\nCRUSH maps already use the canonical negative id corresponding to the\nbucket slot, so this restores the invariant expected by\nwork-\u003ework[-1 - in-\u003eid] without changing valid map behavior.",
  "id": "GHSA-qwcm-8gh9-xc6h",
  "modified": "2026-09-14T15:32:33Z",
  "published": "2026-09-11T21:31:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89656"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/00562ccd4e88d092b9b851df50fad20442bfeb24"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3516a4131c4e45d62ee4e42e82c36930e8c1fbbd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3cde4a8302301679937474a5f7a851394cc1bd11"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4aeb93daadf388e72073abc204312dd364eeb30a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e5c6ce252b1eccfd41670a5cf95ab44f7ba7022"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/79900d978158b2d80eef952fc41b9e4dc58d7b83"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/baad5875fdd2f5e248250fc3519bb045d64f1716"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee59040d6ed1a5f8d10d27174b8f32c90ca8e89a"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.