GHSA-QQCM-W5C8-F3QV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

accel/amdxdna: Use caller client for debug BO sync

amdxdna_drm_sync_bo_ioctl() looks up args->handle in the ioctl caller's drm_file. For SYNC_DIRECT_FROM_DEVICE, it then calls amdxdna_hwctx_sync_debug_bo(), but passes abo->client.

amdxdna_hwctx_sync_debug_bo() uses the passed client both as the handle namespace for debug_bo_hdl and as the owner of the hardware context xarray. Those must match the file that supplied args->handle. The BO's stored client pointer is object state, not the ioctl context.

Pass filp->driver_priv instead, matching the original handle lookup.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72090"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:21:23Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naccel/amdxdna: Use caller client for debug BO sync\n\namdxdna_drm_sync_bo_ioctl() looks up args-\u003ehandle in the ioctl caller\u0027s\ndrm_file. For SYNC_DIRECT_FROM_DEVICE, it then calls\namdxdna_hwctx_sync_debug_bo(), but passes abo-\u003eclient.\n\namdxdna_hwctx_sync_debug_bo() uses the passed client both as the handle\nnamespace for debug_bo_hdl and as the owner of the hardware context xarray.\nThose must match the file that supplied args-\u003ehandle. The BO\u0027s stored\nclient pointer is object state, not the ioctl context.\n\nPass filp-\u003edriver_priv instead, matching the original handle lookup.",
  "id": "GHSA-qqcm-w5c8-f3qv",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:09Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72090"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/216e43d93dd49ec253052741aa476e51a8c54cd8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7caf2a2351d4053075670ff3e26a6815da0a9e1e"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.