GHSA-QMFM-65J9-7J88

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 01:57 – Updated: 2022-05-01 01:57
VLAI?
Details

Pico Server (pServ) 3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a URL with multiple leading "/" (slash) characters and ".." sequences.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-1365"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-05-16T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Pico Server (pServ) 3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a URL with multiple leading \"/\" (slash) characters and \"..\" sequences.",
  "id": "GHSA-qmfm-65j9-7j88",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T01:57:50Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T01:57:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-1365"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure\u0026m=111625635716712\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=327708"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redteam-pentesting.de/advisories/rt-sa-2005-010.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13642"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…