GHSA-QJFH-XC44-RM9X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2020-09-03 16:49 – Updated: 2020-08-31 18:43
VLAI?
Summary
Path Traversal in file-static-server
Details
All versions of file-static-server are vulnerable to Path Traversal. Due to insufficient input sanitization in URLs, attackers can access server files by using relative paths when fetching files.
Recommendation
No fix is currently available. Consider using an alternative module until a fix is made available.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "file-static-server"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-22"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-08-31T18:43:54Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "All versions of `file-static-server` are vulnerable to Path Traversal. Due to insufficient input sanitization in URLs, attackers can access server files by using relative paths when fetching files. \n\n\n## Recommendation\n\nNo fix is currently available. Consider using an alternative module until a fix is made available.\n",
"id": "GHSA-qjfh-xc44-rm9x",
"modified": "2020-08-31T18:43:54Z",
"published": "2020-09-03T16:49:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/310671"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/1008"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Path Traversal in file-static-server"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…