GHSA-QHC2-26QW-5RG9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-02 18:31 – Updated: 2025-11-12 21:30
VLAI
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Mark PCIe controller as cache coherent
If the controller is not marked as cache coherent, then kernel will try to ensure coherency during dma-ops and that may cause data corruption. So, mark the PCIe node as dma-coherent as the devices on PCIe bus are cache coherent.
Severity
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-53043"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-02T16:15:23Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\narm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Mark PCIe controller as cache coherent\n\nIf the controller is not marked as cache coherent, then kernel will\ntry to ensure coherency during dma-ops and that may cause data corruption.\nSo, mark the PCIe node as dma-coherent as the devices on PCIe bus are\ncache coherent.",
"id": "GHSA-qhc2-26qw-5rg9",
"modified": "2025-11-12T21:30:59Z",
"published": "2025-05-02T18:31:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53043"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/267b899375bf38944d915c9654d6eb434edad0ce"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a63441e83724fee1ef3fd37b237d40d90780766"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e43bba938e2c9104bb4f8bc417ac4d7bb29755e1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…