GHSA-Q9M2-FHV9-3JCF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 17:31 – Updated: 2026-05-08 17:31
VLAI
Summary
`potato-annotation` has a Project-Boundary Bypass
Details

Summary

validate_path_security uses string-prefix containment (startswith) for boundary checks. This allows paths that are outside the intended project directory but share its prefix string (e.g., /tmp/potato_proj_demo_evil/... vs /tmp/potato_proj_demo) to be accepted.

Details

Affected source location (root cause)

File: potato/server_utils/config_module.py

Snippet (lines 370–373):

real_path = os.path.realpath(normalized_path)
real_base = os.path.realpath(base_dir)
if not real_path.startswith(real_base):
    raise ConfigSecurityError(...)

Snippet (lines 384–389):

real_path = os.path.realpath(normalized_path)
check_dir = project_dir if project_dir else base_dir
real_check_dir = os.path.realpath(check_dir)
if not real_path.startswith(real_check_dir):
    raise ConfigSecurityError(...)

startswith() is string-based, so /tmp/potato_proj_demo_evil/... passes when checked against /tmp/potato_proj_demo.

Confirmed affected call sites

File: potato/server_utils/config_module.py

1) validate_file_paths task_dir branch (line 2113)

validated_task_dir = validate_path_security(task_dir, project_dir)

2) validate_file_paths data_files branch (line 2151)

validated_path = validate_path_security(file_path, base_dir, project_dir)

3) validate_training_config training.data_file branch (line 2286)

validated_path = validate_path_security(data_file, base_dir, project_dir)

PoC

from potato.server_utils.config_module import validate_path_security

base = '/tmp/potato_proj_demo'
vuln = '/tmp/potato_proj_demo_evil/file.txt'

try:
    print('inside=', validate_path_security('/tmp/potato_proj_demo/file.txt', base, base))
except Exception as e:
    print('inside_error=', type(e).__name__, e)

try:
    validate_path_security('/tmp/other_demo/file.txt', base, base)
except Exception as e:
    print('baseline=', type(e).__name__, e)

print('trigger=', validate_path_security(vuln, base, base))

Impact

  • Can allow unauthorized sibling-prefix file access outside intended project boundary.
  • Can affect read paths (data_files, training.data_file, base_css, header_logo) and output/path placement depending on configuration.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "potato-annotation"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.4.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-08T17:31:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n`validate_path_security` uses string-prefix containment (`startswith`) for boundary checks. This allows paths that are **outside** the intended project directory but share its prefix string (e.g., `/tmp/potato_proj_demo_evil/...` vs `/tmp/potato_proj_demo`) to be accepted.\n\n## Details\n### Affected source location (root cause)\n**File:** `potato/server_utils/config_module.py`\n\n**Snippet (lines 370\u2013373):**\n```python\nreal_path = os.path.realpath(normalized_path)\nreal_base = os.path.realpath(base_dir)\nif not real_path.startswith(real_base):\n    raise ConfigSecurityError(...)\n```\n\n**Snippet (lines 384\u2013389):**\n```python\nreal_path = os.path.realpath(normalized_path)\ncheck_dir = project_dir if project_dir else base_dir\nreal_check_dir = os.path.realpath(check_dir)\nif not real_path.startswith(real_check_dir):\n    raise ConfigSecurityError(...)\n```\n\n`startswith()` is string-based, so `/tmp/potato_proj_demo_evil/...` passes when checked against `/tmp/potato_proj_demo`.\n\n### Confirmed affected call sites\n**File:** `potato/server_utils/config_module.py`\n\n1) `validate_file_paths` task_dir branch (line 2113)\n```python\nvalidated_task_dir = validate_path_security(task_dir, project_dir)\n```\n\n2) `validate_file_paths` data_files branch (line 2151)\n```python\nvalidated_path = validate_path_security(file_path, base_dir, project_dir)\n```\n\n3) `validate_training_config` training.data_file branch (line 2286)\n```python\nvalidated_path = validate_path_security(data_file, base_dir, project_dir)\n```\n\n## PoC\n```python\nfrom potato.server_utils.config_module import validate_path_security\n\nbase = \u0027/tmp/potato_proj_demo\u0027\nvuln = \u0027/tmp/potato_proj_demo_evil/file.txt\u0027\n\ntry:\n    print(\u0027inside=\u0027, validate_path_security(\u0027/tmp/potato_proj_demo/file.txt\u0027, base, base))\nexcept Exception as e:\n    print(\u0027inside_error=\u0027, type(e).__name__, e)\n\ntry:\n    validate_path_security(\u0027/tmp/other_demo/file.txt\u0027, base, base)\nexcept Exception as e:\n    print(\u0027baseline=\u0027, type(e).__name__, e)\n\nprint(\u0027trigger=\u0027, validate_path_security(vuln, base, base))\n```\n\n## Impact\n- Can allow unauthorized sibling-prefix file access outside intended project boundary.\n- Can affect read paths (`data_files`, `training.data_file`, `base_css`, `header_logo`) and output/path placement depending on configuration.",
  "id": "GHSA-q9m2-fhv9-3jcf",
  "modified": "2026-05-08T17:31:07Z",
  "published": "2026-05-08T17:31:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/davidjurgens/potato/security/advisories/GHSA-q9m2-fhv9-3jcf"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/davidjurgens/potato"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "`potato-annotation` has a Project-Boundary Bypass"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.