GHSA-Q944-85CM-W3R6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-06 09:31 – Updated: 2026-10-06 09:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/amdgpu: check ras and obj before dereference

nbio_v7_9_handle_ras_controller_intr_no_bifring() dereferences ras and obj without checking either for NULL. Both amdgpu_ras_get_context() and amdgpu_ras_find_obj() can return NULL, e.g. during the window between adev->nbio.ras being set (early in amdgpu_ras_init(), by design, to enable the fatal-error interrupt as soon as possible) and the PCIE_BIF ras object actually being created in RAS late_init. Any interrupt in that window crashes in hard-IRQ context.

This is analogous to commit d190b459b2a4 ("drm/amdgpu: the warning dereferencing obj for nbio_v7_4"), which fixed the same issue in the nbio_v7_4 handler.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

(cherry picked from commit c7071767a50a32ed727cf800ac84372429e3b4b3)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-98270"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-06T09:18:16Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdgpu: check ras and obj before dereference\n\nnbio_v7_9_handle_ras_controller_intr_no_bifring() dereferences ras and obj\nwithout checking either for NULL. Both amdgpu_ras_get_context() and\namdgpu_ras_find_obj() can return NULL, e.g. during the window between\nadev-\u003enbio.ras being set (early in amdgpu_ras_init(), by design, to\nenable the fatal-error interrupt as soon as possible) and the PCIE_BIF\nras object actually being created in RAS late_init. Any interrupt in that\nwindow crashes in hard-IRQ context.\n\nThis is analogous to commit d190b459b2a4 (\"drm/amdgpu: the warning\ndereferencing obj for nbio_v7_4\"), which fixed the same issue in the\nnbio_v7_4 handler.\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.\n\n(cherry picked from commit c7071767a50a32ed727cf800ac84372429e3b4b3)",
  "id": "GHSA-q944-85cm-w3r6",
  "modified": "2026-10-06T09:31:33Z",
  "published": "2026-10-06T09:31:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98270"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/315c22712715491f0dfafdaf2c2b437540e68702"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/37583946d8751f8e285c467d770ac0b609b82a23"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/723d4dc628d764b19cf9efca14b82cca5ff020c9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b7c7f07a40037514f8e890aa00f8d7b196d680cf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fc5f845a291fc8175e6857cd6ad042818da192e8"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.