GHSA-Q7MH-RC36-3J7H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 15:31 – Updated: 2026-05-20 18:31
VLAI
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xhci: Fix NULL pointer dereference when reading portli debugfs files
Michal reported and debgged a NULL pointer dereference bug in the recently added portli debugfs files
Oops is caused when there are more port registers counted in xhci->max_ports than ports reported by Supported Protocol capabilities. This is possible if max_ports is more than maximum port number, or if there are gaps between ports of different speeds the 'Supported Protocol' capabilities.
In such cases port->rhub will be NULL so we can't reach xhci behind it. Add an explicit NULL check for this case, and print portli in hex without dereferencing port->rhub.
Severity
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-43431"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-08T15:16:55Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxhci: Fix NULL pointer dereference when reading portli debugfs files\n\nMichal reported and debgged a NULL pointer dereference bug in the\nrecently added portli debugfs files\n\nOops is caused when there are more port registers counted in\nxhci-\u003emax_ports than ports reported by Supported Protocol capabilities.\nThis is possible if max_ports is more than maximum port number, or\nif there are gaps between ports of different speeds the \u0027Supported\nProtocol\u0027 capabilities.\n\nIn such cases port-\u003erhub will be NULL so we can\u0027t reach xhci behind it.\nAdd an explicit NULL check for this case, and print portli in hex\nwithout dereferencing port-\u003erhub.",
"id": "GHSA-q7mh-rc36-3j7h",
"modified": "2026-05-20T18:31:30Z",
"published": "2026-05-08T15:31:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43431"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9c8bef223c6e991276188d30d74bdb2cbd8be652"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae4ff9dead5efa2025eddfcdb29411432bf40a7c"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…