GHSA-Q4PX-5X5J-5P92
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-02 12:31 – Updated: 2026-10-02 12:31Asymmetric Resource Consumption vulnerability in Apache Directory LDAP API.
Storing a password using the bcrypt algorithm with a high force like 30 in a LDAP server that supports this algorithm will cause the server CPU to run for hours checking the credentials. A bounded cost should be enforced to avoid a server DOS.
This issue affects Apache Directory LDAP API: from 2.1.0 before 2.1.9.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.1.9, which fixes the issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-103880"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-405"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-02T10:17:06Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "Asymmetric Resource Consumption\u00a0vulnerability in Apache Directory LDAP API.\n\n\n\nStoring a password using the bcrypt algorithm with a high force like 30 in a LDAP server that supports this algorithm will cause the server CPU to\u00a0 run for hours checking the credentials. A bounded cost should be enforced to avoid a server DOS.\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Directory LDAP API: from 2.1.0 before 2.1.9.\n\n\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 2.1.9, which fixes the issue.",
"id": "GHSA-q4px-5x5j-5p92",
"modified": "2026-10-02T12:31:10Z",
"published": "2026-10-02T12:31:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-103880"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/39q63m54v9go6xj7pqj7q18c3szn9go4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.