GHSA-Q2PG-9XR3-7R4G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-07 12:31 – Updated: 2026-10-07 18:32Apache YuniKorn 1.9.0 and earlier does not implement label and user annotation checks for workload UPDATE action bypassing all checks. Workloads in YuniKorn are defined as the following Kubernetes objects: "deployments", "replicasets", "statefulsets", "daemonsets", "jobs", "cronjobs". The CREATE action correctly enforces the checks for all object types.
The bypass allows any user to specify an arbitrary user info annotation. The same bypass also allows changing the application ID for the workload. The combination of the two applied in one UPDATE could allow access to a queue that the user normally would not have access to. Quota usage for the queue might be impacted if the application runs in the incorrect queue. User based quota enforcement is also based on the user annotation. User quota tracking could be side stepped even if the application runs in the correct queue.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.10.0, which fixes this issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-92393"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-07T10:17:42Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Apache YuniKorn 1.9.0 and earlier does not implement label and user annotation checks for workload UPDATE action bypassing all checks.\u00a0Workloads in YuniKorn are defined as the following Kubernetes objects: \"deployments\",\u00a0\"replicasets\", \"statefulsets\", \"daemonsets\", \"jobs\", \"cronjobs\".\u00a0The CREATE action correctly enforces the checks for all object types.\n\n\nThe bypass allows any user to specify an arbitrary user info annotation. The same bypass also allows changing the application ID for the workload. The combination of the two applied in one UPDATE\u00a0could allow access to a queue that the user normally would not have access to.\u00a0Quota usage for the queue might be impacted if the application runs in the incorrect queue.\u00a0User based quota enforcement is also based on the user annotation. User quota tracking could be side stepped even if the application runs in the correct queue.\n\n\n\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 1.10.0, which fixes this issue.",
"id": "GHSA-q2pg-9xr3-7r4g",
"modified": "2026-10-07T18:32:08Z",
"published": "2026-10-07T12:31:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-92393"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/sfo83zlrrx9ftbox9oxcp03qox2co449"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/10/07/25"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.