GHSA-PXV7-MJVV-77VW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:18 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:18
VLAI?
Details
Buffer overflow in Atepmon.sys in ISecSoft Anti-Trojan Elite 4.2.1 and earlier, and possibly 4.2.2, allows local users to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via long inputs to the 0x00222494 IOCTL.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-5048"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-11-13T02:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in Atepmon.sys in ISecSoft Anti-Trojan Elite 4.2.1 and earlier, and possibly 4.2.2, allows local users to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via long inputs to the 0x00222494 IOCTL.",
"id": "GHSA-pxv7-mjvv-77vw",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:18:25Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:18:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-5048"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46464"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32669"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ntinternals.org/ntiadv0802/ntiadv0802.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32202"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…