GHSA-PXHV-6MJW-34J3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-23 15:31 – Updated: 2026-10-23 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfs: stop exchanging reflink flags when exchanging mappings

When an exchange covers both files from offset 0 to i_disk_size, xmi_can_exchange_reflink_flags() assumes every mapping moved and hands the reflink flag over to the other file.

That assumption is wrong. A file can still own shared blocks past i_disk_size, e.g. after EXCHANGE_RANGE_TO_EOF sets a smaller size without unmapping anything. The flag is cleared anyway, and the next write to such a block happens in place instead of CoW, corrupting the other file that shares it.

Commit a23eca88448e ("xfs: fix exchange-range reflink flag clearing issue with INO1_WRITTEN") fixed one instance of this. Rather than add another special case, stop moving the flags. xfs_exchmaps_ensure_reflink() already sets the flag on both inodes before the exchange, so both just keep it.

Nothing sets CLEAR_INO{1,2}_REFLINK anymore. Intents logged by older kernels may still carry them; recovery already masks them off, so they stay in the log format mask and are ignored.

XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT has the same problem: it moves the reflink flag from one inode to the other along with the extents. Just removing that is not enough here: the exchange path flags both inodes up front in xfs_exchmaps_ensure_reflink(), but swapext has no such step, so the inode receiving the shared extents would be left without the flag. Set it on both inodes instead, and make sure both have a CoW fork, since an inode with the reflink flag is expected to have one.

The flag now stays until FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE, xfs_scrub, or a truncate to zero removes it.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-98975"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-23T13:17:19Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxfs: stop exchanging reflink flags when exchanging mappings\n\nWhen an exchange covers both files from offset 0 to i_disk_size,\nxmi_can_exchange_reflink_flags() assumes every mapping moved and hands\nthe reflink flag over to the other file.\n\nThat assumption is wrong.  A file can still own shared blocks past\ni_disk_size, e.g. after EXCHANGE_RANGE_TO_EOF sets a smaller size\nwithout unmapping anything.  The flag is cleared anyway, and the next\nwrite to such a block happens in place instead of CoW, corrupting the\nother file that shares it.\n\nCommit a23eca88448e (\"xfs: fix exchange-range reflink flag clearing\nissue with INO1_WRITTEN\") fixed one instance of this.  Rather than add\nanother special case, stop moving the flags.\nxfs_exchmaps_ensure_reflink() already sets the flag on both inodes\nbefore the exchange, so both just keep it.\n\nNothing sets CLEAR_INO{1,2}_REFLINK anymore.  Intents logged by older\nkernels may still carry them; recovery already masks them off, so they\nstay in the log format mask and are ignored.\n\nXFS_IOC_SWAPEXT has the same problem: it moves the reflink flag from\none inode to the other along with the extents.  Just removing that is\nnot enough here: the exchange path flags both inodes up front in\nxfs_exchmaps_ensure_reflink(), but swapext has no such step, so the\ninode receiving the shared extents would be left without the flag.\nSet it on both inodes instead, and make sure both have a CoW fork,\nsince an inode with the reflink flag is expected to have one.\n\nThe flag now stays until FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE, xfs_scrub, or a\ntruncate to zero removes it.",
  "id": "GHSA-pxhv-6mjw-34j3",
  "modified": "2026-10-23T15:31:33Z",
  "published": "2026-10-23T15:31:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98975"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fa2f3a7ef7ee0f2503a4b0afe24bc8c9d0820be"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4756c94260e69ce42612b8220c3614f02f7a11d5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d3b9b2c9dc57f93f36c716ab752548cb4db9900"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d84d6c1a7f1e2de9e601703a326a4c1b7b421943"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.