GHSA-PWHF-4XJ4-5QG8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:48 – Updated: 2025-04-11 04:17
VLAI?
Details
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in goform/Quick_setup on Cisco EPC3925 devices allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change a password via the Password and PasswordReEnter parameters, aka Bug ID CSCuh37496.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-6976"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-12-19T22:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in goform/Quick_setup on Cisco EPC3925 devices allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change a password via the Password and PasswordReEnter parameters, aka Bug ID CSCuh37496.",
"id": "GHSA-pwhf-4xj4-5qg8",
"modified": "2025-04-11T04:17:18Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:48:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-6976"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/101097"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/124449/Cisco-EPC3925-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/30362"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.nerdbox.it/cisco-epc3925-csrf-vulnerability"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/64341"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…