GHSA-PW85-4JWP-M329

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 03:01 – Updated: 2022-04-29 03:01
VLAI
Details

HTTPMail service in MailEnable Professional 1.18 does not properly handle arguments to the Authorization header, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (null dereference and application crash). NOTE: This is a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-1348.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-2726"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "HTTPMail service in MailEnable Professional 1.18 does not properly handle arguments to the Authorization header, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (null dereference and application crash).  NOTE: This is a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-1348.",
  "id": "GHSA-pw85-4jwp-m329",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T03:01:59Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T03:01:59Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-2726"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2004-05/0159.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/11588"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.oliverkarow.de/research/MailWebHTTPAuthCrash.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…