GHSA-PW6X-273J-MP83

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-25 09:31 – Updated: 2026-06-25 09:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: fix leak if split 6 GHz scanning fails

rdev->int_scan_req is leaked if cfg80211_scan() fails. Note that it's supposed to be released at ___cfg80211_scan_done() but this doesn't happen as rdev->scan_req is NULL at that point, too, leading to the early return from the freeing function.

unreferenced object 0xffff8881161d0800 (size 512): comm "wpa_supplicant", pid 379, jiffies 4294749765 hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0 81 13 16 81 88 ff ff ................ backtrace (crc c867fdb6): kmemleak_alloc+0x89/0x90 __kmalloc_noprof+0x2fd/0x410 cfg80211_scan+0x133/0x730 nl80211_trigger_scan+0xc69/0x1cc0 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x204/0x2f0 genl_rcv_msg+0x431/0x6b0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x143/0x3f0 genl_rcv+0x27/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x4f6/0x820 netlink_sendmsg+0x797/0xce0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc4/0x160 _syssendmsg+0x5e4/0x890 _sys_sendmsg+0xf8/0x180 __sys_sendmsg+0x136/0x1e0 __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x76/0xc0 x64_sys_call+0x13f0/0x17d0

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53258"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-25T09:16:43Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: fix leak if split 6 GHz scanning fails\n\nrdev-\u003eint_scan_req is leaked if cfg80211_scan() fails.  Note that it\u0027s\nsupposed to be released at ___cfg80211_scan_done() but this doesn\u0027t happen\nas rdev-\u003escan_req is NULL at that point, too, leading to the early return\nfrom the freeing function.\n\nunreferenced object 0xffff8881161d0800 (size 512):\n  comm \"wpa_supplicant\", pid 379, jiffies 4294749765\n  hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................\n    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0 81 13 16 81 88 ff ff  ................\n  backtrace (crc c867fdb6):\n    kmemleak_alloc+0x89/0x90\n    __kmalloc_noprof+0x2fd/0x410\n    cfg80211_scan+0x133/0x730\n    nl80211_trigger_scan+0xc69/0x1cc0\n    genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x204/0x2f0\n    genl_rcv_msg+0x431/0x6b0\n    netlink_rcv_skb+0x143/0x3f0\n    genl_rcv+0x27/0x40\n    netlink_unicast+0x4f6/0x820\n    netlink_sendmsg+0x797/0xce0\n    __sock_sendmsg+0xc4/0x160\n    ____sys_sendmsg+0x5e4/0x890\n    ___sys_sendmsg+0xf8/0x180\n    __sys_sendmsg+0x136/0x1e0\n    __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x76/0xc0\n    x64_sys_call+0x13f0/0x17d0\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).",
  "id": "GHSA-pw6x-273j-mp83",
  "modified": "2026-06-25T09:31:22Z",
  "published": "2026-06-25T09:31:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53258"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a24134ddc18b4d440714365637d440b7121447b9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8694f7cc29287e843648d1075177b9a2000d957"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fb8db813eba2e56ee001c9fb5c2ce2cb78c42642"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…