GHSA-PW5X-2MF9-3XC8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-11 19:39 – Updated: 2026-05-11 19:39
VLAI
Summary
MantisBT has a Private Bugnote Attachment Content Leak via REST API
Details
A missing authorization check in MantisBT's file visibility function allows any authenticated user (REPORTER+) to download attachments on private bugnotes they should not be able to access, via the REST API endpoint GET /api/rest/issues/{id}/files and SOAP API mc_issue_attachment_get endpoint.
Impact
- REPORTER (access level 25) can view file attachments that were uploaded to private bugnotes by DEVELOPER/MANAGER/ADMIN users
- Private bugnotes are intended for internal developer discussion; their attachments (logs, screenshots, patches) should be equally protected
- The web UI is NOT affected — it filters through bugnote_get_all_visible_bugnotes() first
Patches
- 029d9d203d9e4ae96b3e59d552fa7395cc1e5071
Workarounds
None
Credits
Thanks to the following security researchers for independently discovering and responsibly reporting the issue. - Vishal Shukla - Tristan Madani (@TristanInSec) from Talence Security - Tang Cheuk Hei (@siunam321)
This advisory's contents was largely copied from Tristan's well-written report.
Severity
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.28.1"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "mantisbt/mantisbt"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.23.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.28.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42071"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-11T19:39:43Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A missing authorization check in MantisBT\u0027s file visibility function allows any authenticated user (REPORTER+) to download attachments on private bugnotes they should not be able to access, via the REST API endpoint GET /api/rest/issues/{id}/files and SOAP API mc_issue_attachment_get endpoint.\n\n### Impact\n- REPORTER (access level 25) can view file attachments that were uploaded to private bugnotes by DEVELOPER/MANAGER/ADMIN users\n- Private bugnotes are intended for internal developer discussion; their attachments (logs, screenshots, patches) should be equally protected\n- The web UI is NOT affected \u2014 it filters through bugnote_get_all_visible_bugnotes() first\n\n### Patches\n- 029d9d203d9e4ae96b3e59d552fa7395cc1e5071\n\n### Workarounds\nNone\n\n### Credits\nThanks to the following security researchers for independently discovering and responsibly reporting the issue.\n- Vishal Shukla \n- Tristan Madani (@TristanInSec) from Talence Security \n- Tang Cheuk Hei (@siunam321) \n\nThis advisory\u0027s contents was largely copied from Tristan\u0027s well-written report.",
"id": "GHSA-pw5x-2mf9-3xc8",
"modified": "2026-05-11T19:39:44Z",
"published": "2026-05-11T19:39:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/security/advisories/GHSA-pw5x-2mf9-3xc8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/commit/029d9d203d9e4ae96b3e59d552fa7395cc1e5071"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-xjmx-cprh-646r"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=27039"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=36985"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=37092"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "MantisBT has a Private Bugnote Attachment Content Leak via REST API"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…