GHSA-PRRH-QVHF-X788
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-31 21:27 – Updated: 2022-09-13 17:33Impact
An attacker could steal an admin's cookie
Patches
The issue is fixed in 5.0.2
References
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "prestashop/productcomments"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.0.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-35933"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-08-31T21:27:38Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-09-02T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\nAn attacker could steal an admin\u0027s cookie\n\n### Patches\nThe issue is fixed in 5.0.2\n\n### References\n[Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html)\n",
"id": "GHSA-prrh-qvhf-x788",
"modified": "2022-09-13T17:33:45Z",
"published": "2022-08-31T21:27:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/PrestaShop/productcomments/security/advisories/GHSA-prrh-qvhf-x788"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-35933"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/PrestaShop/productcomments/commit/314456d739155aa71f0b235827e8e0f24b97c26b"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/PrestaShop/productcomments"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "PrestaShop Product Comments Cross-site Scripting vulnerability"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.