GHSA-PRJQ-F4Q3-FVFR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-15 19:05 – Updated: 2024-05-20 19:38
VLAI
Summary
github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2 is vulnerable to NULL Pointer Dereference
Details

Impact

In versions prior to v0.7.0 it was possible for an attacker to supply an invalid assertion which would trigger a panic due to a nil-pointer dereference.

Patches

The issue was patched in v0.7.0, released on March 2, 2022.

Workarounds

Callers to gosaml2 can use recover() to handle panics to mitigate a potential DoS.

References

See issue #59 for details.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.7.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/russellhaering/goxmldsig"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.1.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-7731"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-476"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-11-15T19:05:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nIn versions prior to v0.7.0 it was possible for an attacker to supply an invalid assertion which would trigger a panic due to a nil-pointer dereference.\n\n### Patches\nThe issue was patched in v0.7.0, released on March 2, 2022.\n\n### Workarounds\nCallers to `gosaml2` can use `recover()` to handle panics to mitigate a potential DoS.\n\n### References\nSee issue [#59](https://github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2/issues/59) for details.",
  "id": "GHSA-prjq-f4q3-fvfr",
  "modified": "2024-05-20T19:38:33Z",
  "published": "2022-11-15T19:05:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2/security/advisories/GHSA-prjq-f4q3-fvfr"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2/issues/59"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/russellhaering/goxmldsig/issues/48"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2/pull/90"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2/commit/66e3b7affd622b8b24ea1e18845f045e46b23424"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2/releases/tag/v0.7.0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-GOLANG-GITHUBCOMRUSSELLHAERINGGOSAML2-608302"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2 is vulnerable to NULL Pointer Dereference"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…