GHSA-PQ4Q-9JXH-RFJV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 00:40 – Updated: 2022-05-17 00:40
VLAI?
Details

SQL injection vulnerability in buyer_detail.php in Pre Multi-Vendor Shopping Malls allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) sid and (2) cid parameters.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-6227"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-89"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-02-20T23:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "SQL injection vulnerability in buyer_detail.php in Pre Multi-Vendor Shopping Malls allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) sid and (2) cid parameters.",
  "id": "GHSA-pq4q-9jxh-rfjv",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T00:40:51Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T00:40:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-6227"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46387"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/6999"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32127"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/3018"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…