GHSA-PPJC-PF2V-9XVX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-12 00:00 – Updated: 2022-05-21 00:00
VLAI
Details

Tenda AX1803 v1.0.0.1_2890 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow. The vulnerability lies in rootfs_ In / goform / setsystimecfg of / bin / tdhttpd in ubif file system, attackers can access http://ip/goform/SetSysTimeCfg, and by setting the ntpserve parameter, the stack buffer overflow can be caused to achieve the effect of router denial of service.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-30040"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-05-11T18:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Tenda AX1803 v1.0.0.1_2890 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow. The vulnerability lies in rootfs_ In / goform / setsystimecfg of / bin / tdhttpd in ubif file system, attackers can access http://ip/goform/SetSysTimeCfg, and by setting the ntpserve parameter, the stack buffer overflow can be caused to achieve the effect of router denial of service.",
  "id": "GHSA-ppjc-pf2v-9xvx",
  "modified": "2022-05-21T00:00:56Z",
  "published": "2022-05-12T00:00:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-30040"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Le1a/CVE-2022-30040"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Le1a/Tenda-AX1803-Denial-of-service"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…