GHSA-PGCJ-5WJ3-JCMR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-16 12:30 – Updated: 2026-09-16 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

s390/vfio-ap: Fix hot-unplug skipped when last AP adapter or domain removed

The vfio_ap_mdev_hot_unplug_cfg() function uses the return value of bitmap_andnot() to determine whether the guest APCB needs to be updated. However, bitmap_andnot() returns false when the resulting destination bitmap is empty. This means that if the only adapter, domain or control domain assigned to an mdev is removed from the host's AP configuration, the bit is correctly cleared from the shadow APCB, but bitmap_andnot() returns false because the result is an empty bitmap. Consequently, do_hotplug remains 0 and vfio_ap_mdev_update_guest_apcb() is never called, leaving the KVM guest with stale hardware access to the unplugged AP devices.

Fix this by replacing the bitmap_andnot() return value check with bitmap_intersects() to determine whether the shadow APCB actually overlaps with the removal mask. If there is an intersection, call bitmap_andnot() solely for its side effect of clearing the bits, then unconditionally set do_hotplug to trigger the guest APCB update.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89957"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-16T11:17:06Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ns390/vfio-ap: Fix hot-unplug skipped when last AP adapter or domain removed\n\nThe vfio_ap_mdev_hot_unplug_cfg() function uses the return value of\nbitmap_andnot() to determine whether the guest APCB needs to be updated.\nHowever, bitmap_andnot() returns false when the resulting destination\nbitmap is empty. This means that if the only adapter, domain or control\ndomain assigned to an mdev is removed from the host\u0027s AP configuration,\nthe bit is correctly cleared from the shadow APCB, but bitmap_andnot()\nreturns false because the result is an empty bitmap. Consequently,\ndo_hotplug remains 0 and vfio_ap_mdev_update_guest_apcb() is never called,\nleaving the KVM guest with stale hardware access to the unplugged AP\ndevices.\n\nFix this by replacing the bitmap_andnot() return value check with\nbitmap_intersects() to determine whether the shadow APCB actually\noverlaps with the removal mask. If there is an intersection, call\nbitmap_andnot() solely for its side effect of clearing the bits, then\nunconditionally set do_hotplug to trigger the guest APCB update.",
  "id": "GHSA-pgcj-5wj3-jcmr",
  "modified": "2026-09-16T15:31:03Z",
  "published": "2026-09-16T12:30:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89957"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04b35dd88c108b2d2ceaaa396aba1cb4049d5831"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a9b049bbdc40165d7f3e20b818eec95e5694d96"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/753aa3bb1273bc0d36adb013d5915cc8ff6b72a9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/917f509bfb88048094dbb85c4e9dbc4d6fe4a886"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c45753c32d452d10d8efaeb52587e9e6e8126e33"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f58e824de8577fe411f6199d659731a0f86a7275"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.