GHSA-PCWR-PC33-M7FQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:45 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:45The remote-access IPSec VPN implementation on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 series devices, PIX Security Appliances 500 series devices, and VPN Concentrators 3000 series devices responds to an Aggressive Mode IKE Phase I message only when the group name is configured on the device, which allows remote attackers to enumerate valid group names via a series of IKE negotiation attempts, aka Bug ID CSCtj96108, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2025.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-4354"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-11-30T22:14:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The remote-access IPSec VPN implementation on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 series devices, PIX Security Appliances 500 series devices, and VPN Concentrators 3000 series devices responds to an Aggressive Mode IKE Phase I message only when the group name is configured on the device, which allows remote attackers to enumerate valid group names via a series of IKE negotiation attempts, aka Bug ID CSCtj96108, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2025.",
"id": "GHSA-pcwr-pc33-m7fq",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:45:54Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:45:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-4354"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080b5992c.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.