GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-PCW4-494R-VQVF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-21 18:31 – Updated: 2025-09-26 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

i2c: core: Run atomic i2c xfer when !preemptible

Since bae1d3a05a8b, i2c transfers are non-atomic if preemption is disabled. However, non-atomic i2c transfers require preemption (e.g. in wait_for_completion() while waiting for the DMA).

panic() calls preempt_disable_notrace() before calling emergency_restart(). Therefore, if an i2c device is used for the restart, the xfer should be atomic. This avoids warnings like:

[ 12.667612] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:318 rcu_note_context_switch+0x33c/0x6b0 [ 12.676926] Voluntary context switch within RCU read-side critical section! ... [ 12.742376] schedule_timeout from wait_for_completion_timeout+0x90/0x114 [ 12.749179] wait_for_completion_timeout from tegra_i2c_wait_completion+0x40/0x70 ... [ 12.994527] atomic_notifier_call_chain from machine_restart+0x34/0x58 [ 13.001050] machine_restart from panic+0x2a8/0x32c

Use !preemptible() instead, which is basically the same check as pre-v5.2.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-52791"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-21T16:15:17Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ni2c: core: Run atomic i2c xfer when !preemptible\n\nSince bae1d3a05a8b, i2c transfers are non-atomic if preemption is\ndisabled. However, non-atomic i2c transfers require preemption (e.g. in\nwait_for_completion() while waiting for the DMA).\n\npanic() calls preempt_disable_notrace() before calling\nemergency_restart(). Therefore, if an i2c device is used for the\nrestart, the xfer should be atomic. This avoids warnings like:\n\n[   12.667612] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:318 rcu_note_context_switch+0x33c/0x6b0\n[   12.676926] Voluntary context switch within RCU read-side critical section!\n...\n[   12.742376]  schedule_timeout from wait_for_completion_timeout+0x90/0x114\n[   12.749179]  wait_for_completion_timeout from tegra_i2c_wait_completion+0x40/0x70\n...\n[   12.994527]  atomic_notifier_call_chain from machine_restart+0x34/0x58\n[   13.001050]  machine_restart from panic+0x2a8/0x32c\n\nUse !preemptible() instead, which is basically the same check as\npre-v5.2.",
  "id": "GHSA-pcw4-494r-vqvf",
  "modified": "2025-09-26T18:31:17Z",
  "published": "2024-05-21T18:31:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52791"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/185f3617adc8fe45e40489b458f03911f0dec46c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25284c46b657f48c0f3880a2e0706c70d81182c0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25eb381a736e7ae39a4245ef5c96484eb1073809"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3473cf43b9068b9dfef2f545f833f33c6a544b91"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8c3fa52a46ff4d208cefb1a462ec94e0043a91e1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aa49c90894d06e18a1ee7c095edbd2f37c232d02"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6237afabc349c1c7909db00e15d2816519e0d2b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…