GHSA-P9F5-H3RX-J5QW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-22 23:59 – Updated: 2026-07-21 13:36
VLAI
Summary
Gogs Missing Authorization in Attachment Download
Details

Summary

In Gogs 0.14.1, GET /attachments/:uuid returns the raw attachment file without verifying whether the requester has view permission for the associated Issue/Comment/Release or the repository. In a test environment with REQUIRE_SIGNIN_VIEW = false, we confirmed that an unauthenticated user can download attachments belonging to a private repository.

Description

/attachments/:uuid retrieves an attachment record solely by the UUID provided in the URL and returns the corresponding local file without performing any authorization checks against the attachment’s parent object (Issue/Comment/Release) or the repository it belongs to. As a result, even attachments under private repositories can be downloaded by an unauthenticated user (or a user without proper permissions) as long as the UUID is known.

Relevant code (internal/cmd/web.go:306):

m.Get("/attachments/:uuid", func(c *context.Context) {
    attach, err := database.GetAttachmentByUUID(c.Params(":uuid"))
    if err != nil {
        c.NotFoundOrError(err, "get attachment by UUID")
        return
    } else if !com.IsFile(attach.LocalPath()) {
        c.NotFound()
        return
    }

    fr, err := os.Open(attach.LocalPath())
    if err != nil {
        c.Error(err, "open attachment file")
        return
    }
    defer fr.Close()

    c.Header().Set("Content-Security-Policy", "default-src 'none'; style-src 'unsafe-inline'; sandbox")
    c.Header().Set("Cache-Control", "public,max-age=86400")
    c.Header().Set("Content-Disposition", fmt.Sprintf(`inline; filename="%s"`, attach.Name))

    if _, err = io.Copy(c.Resp, fr); err != nil {
        c.Error(err, "copy from file to response")
        return
    }
})

The UUID lookup itself also performs no validation tied to repository visibility or user permissions. Authorization is not enforced at this layer.

Relevant code (internal/database/attachment.go:124):

// GetAttachmentByUUID returns attachment by given UUID.
func GetAttachmentByUUID(uuid string) (*Attachment, error) {
    return getAttachmentByUUID(x, uuid)
}

Preconditions

  • The attacker knows the target attachment’s UUID (i.e., the attachment URL).
  • For unauthenticated exploitation: [auth] REQUIRE_SIGNIN_VIEW = false.
  • Even when REQUIRE_SIGNIN_VIEW = true, exploitation may still be possible because the handler does not check repository-level permissions; a user who can log in but lacks access to the target repository may still retrieve the attachment.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Log in as an administrator and create a private repository, e.g. myadmin/idor-attach-1770724346-1a13bb.
  2. Add an attachment to an Issue in that repository and note the attachment UUID (example UUID used during testing: f06d90f8-5b62-4c10-ac8d-f11fdf870b57).
  3. Log out and access the following as an unauthenticated user:

  4. The repository page → 404 Not Found image

  5. The Issue page under that repository → 404 Not Found image

  6. GET /attachments/<uuid> → the attachment file is successfully downloaded image

Minimum Required Privileges

  • REQUIRE_SIGNIN_VIEW = false: none (works without authentication).
  • REQUIRE_SIGNIN_VIEW = true: only the ability to log in (repository view permission is not required in practice).

Impact

  • Confidential information attached to private repositories or restricted Issues/Releases may be disclosed.

  • Examples include credentials, cryptographic keys, personal data, internal documents, or unpublished source code fragments.

  • While the severity depends on the attachment contents, attachments frequently contain sensitive data, making the potential impact high.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.14.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "gogs.io/gogs"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.14.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-52799"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-639",
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-22T23:59:03Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T21:16:55Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nIn Gogs 0.14.1, `GET /attachments/:uuid` returns the raw attachment file **without verifying whether the requester has view permission for the associated Issue/Comment/Release or the repository**.\nIn a test environment with `REQUIRE_SIGNIN_VIEW = false`, we confirmed that **an unauthenticated user can download attachments belonging to a private repository**.\n\n## Description\n\n`/attachments/:uuid` retrieves an attachment record solely by the UUID provided in the URL and returns the corresponding local file **without performing any authorization checks** against the attachment\u2019s parent object (Issue/Comment/Release) or the repository it belongs to. As a result, even attachments under private repositories can be downloaded by an unauthenticated user (or a user without proper permissions) as long as the UUID is known.\n\nRelevant code (internal/cmd/web.go:306):\n\n```go\nm.Get(\"/attachments/:uuid\", func(c *context.Context) {\n\tattach, err := database.GetAttachmentByUUID(c.Params(\":uuid\"))\n\tif err != nil {\n\t\tc.NotFoundOrError(err, \"get attachment by UUID\")\n\t\treturn\n\t} else if !com.IsFile(attach.LocalPath()) {\n\t\tc.NotFound()\n\t\treturn\n\t}\n\n\tfr, err := os.Open(attach.LocalPath())\n\tif err != nil {\n\t\tc.Error(err, \"open attachment file\")\n\t\treturn\n\t}\n\tdefer fr.Close()\n\n\tc.Header().Set(\"Content-Security-Policy\", \"default-src \u0027none\u0027; style-src \u0027unsafe-inline\u0027; sandbox\")\n\tc.Header().Set(\"Cache-Control\", \"public,max-age=86400\")\n\tc.Header().Set(\"Content-Disposition\", fmt.Sprintf(`inline; filename=\"%s\"`, attach.Name))\n\n\tif _, err = io.Copy(c.Resp, fr); err != nil {\n\t\tc.Error(err, \"copy from file to response\")\n\t\treturn\n\t}\n})\n```\n\nThe UUID lookup itself also performs **no validation tied to repository visibility or user permissions**. Authorization is not enforced at this layer.\n\nRelevant code (internal/database/attachment.go:124):\n\n```go\n// GetAttachmentByUUID returns attachment by given UUID.\nfunc GetAttachmentByUUID(uuid string) (*Attachment, error) {\n\treturn getAttachmentByUUID(x, uuid)\n}\n```\n\n## Preconditions\n\n* The attacker knows the target attachment\u2019s UUID (i.e., the attachment URL).\n* For unauthenticated exploitation: `[auth] REQUIRE_SIGNIN_VIEW = false`.\n* Even when `REQUIRE_SIGNIN_VIEW = true`, exploitation may still be possible because the handler does not check repository-level permissions; a user who can log in but lacks access to the target repository may still retrieve the attachment.\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\n\n1. Log in as an administrator and create a private repository, e.g. `myadmin/idor-attach-1770724346-1a13bb`.\n2. Add an attachment to an Issue in that repository and note the attachment UUID\n   (example UUID used during testing: `f06d90f8-5b62-4c10-ac8d-f11fdf870b57`).\n3. Log out and access the following as an unauthenticated user:\n\n* The repository page \u2192 404 Not Found\n\u003cimg width=\"1702\" height=\"758\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8fdb1d92-cfc3-4ef8-977e-60ec13f792df\" /\u003e\n\n* The Issue page under that repository \u2192 404 Not Found\n\u003cimg width=\"1983\" height=\"546\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c44c5e69-8ca2-4ea6-a071-62302b7e896f\" /\u003e\n\n* `GET /attachments/\u003cuuid\u003e` \u2192 **the attachment file is successfully downloaded**\n\u003cimg width=\"2007\" height=\"378\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/23950ac6-6b3a-42f8-a06b-b9e0cf508d24\" /\u003e\n\n\n\n## Minimum Required Privileges\n\n* `REQUIRE_SIGNIN_VIEW = false`: none (works without authentication).\n* `REQUIRE_SIGNIN_VIEW = true`: only the ability to log in (repository view permission is not required in practice).\n\n## Impact\n\n* Confidential information attached to private repositories or restricted Issues/Releases may be disclosed.\n\n  * Examples include credentials, cryptographic keys, personal data, internal documents, or unpublished source code fragments.\n* While the severity depends on the attachment contents, attachments frequently contain sensitive data, making the potential impact high.",
  "id": "GHSA-p9f5-h3rx-j5qw",
  "modified": "2026-07-21T13:36:58Z",
  "published": "2026-06-22T23:59:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/security/advisories/GHSA-p9f5-h3rx-j5qw"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52799"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/pull/8320"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/commit/d3ca23f9f33d5710472a775d6dcd3a7bb128bb05"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/releases/tag/v0.14.3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Gogs Missing Authorization in Attachment Download"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.